* Thus wrote Robert Cummings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 12:12, Jason Wong wrote:
> > On Friday 10 October 2003 22:44, Robert Cummings wrote:
> >
> > > > *Most* bottom posters are savvy enough to trim posts adequately to ensure
> > > > that there is no crap to wade through whilst
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 12:12, Jason Wong wrote:
> On Friday 10 October 2003 22:44, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> > > *Most* bottom posters are savvy enough to trim posts adequately to ensure
> > > that there is no crap to wade through whilst maintaining some kind of
> > > continuity within a thread.
>
On Friday 10 October 2003 22:44, Robert Cummings wrote:
> > *Most* bottom posters are savvy enough to trim posts adequately to ensure
> > that there is no crap to wade through whilst maintaining some kind of
> > continuity within a thread.
>
> I'll call this premise one, which is by no means a tau
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 03:43, Jason Wong wrote:
> On Friday 10 October 2003 11:02, Robert Cummings wrote:
> > If you've been following a thread then you'll have read everything
> > anyways. If you bottom post I gotta scan through all the crap I've
> > already read, and that often involves employing
On Friday 10 October 2003 11:02, Robert Cummings wrote:
> If you've been following a thread then you'll have read everything
> anyways. If you bottom post I gotta scan through all the crap I've
> already read, and that often involves employing the down arrow or mouse.
One of the bad habits that to
If you've been following a thread then you'll have read everything
anyways. If you bottom post I gotta scan through all the crap I've
already read, and that often involves employing the down arrow or mouse.
Top posting is more efficient for those who are following along.
Cheers,
Rob.
On Thu, 2003
6 matches
Mail list logo
