RE: [PHP] Apache 2.0 and Sessions

2005-01-11 Thread Stephen Craton
ephen Craton Subject: Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 and Sessions On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 16:02, Stephen Craton wrote: > I just updated to Apache 2.0 and have gotten PHP all with it. However, I > just loaded up a script that worked fine on my old Apache 1.3 install but is > now causing my errors. He

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 and PHP

2003-03-17 Thread Michael Aaron
Thanks for the info. Do you know if this is specifically in regard to the worker MPM under Apache and not the prefork MPM? Or does this not have anything to do with threading? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Michael Aaron wrote: Sorry if this has been answered before but I can n

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 and PHP

2003-03-14 Thread Ernest E Vogelsinger
At 19:37 14.03.2003, Michael Aaron said: [snip] >Sorry if this has been answered before but I can not find it anywhere: > >Why does the PHP docs. state: > "Do not use Apache 2.0 and PHP in a production environment neither on >Unix nor on Windows. " > >What

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 and PHP

2003-03-14 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Michael Aaron wrote: > Sorry if this has been answered before but I can not find it anywhere: > > Why does the PHP docs. state: > "Do not use Apache 2.0 and PHP in a production environment neither on > Unix nor on Windows. " > > What is the reason for this Warning? The co

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 and PHP

2002-08-19 Thread @ Edwin
> >Would I be able to install it along side 1.3 and run it on a separate port? I know some who installed two 1.3s in two different folders, run two different daemons, in two different ports. I think it should work with 1.3 and 2.0 as well... - E > >Cheers >John Wards >SportNetwork.net > > >-

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 and PHP

2002-08-19 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
If you run Apache2 in prefork mode, it should mostly work with PHP. Don't try to use one of the threaded mpms yet. The Apache 2 prefork mpm makes it operate exactly like Apache 1.3 in the way it pre-forks processes and handles one request per process. -Rasmus On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, John Wards wr

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 and PHP

2002-08-19 Thread Aaron Gould
Wait until PHP 4.3.0 before considering Apache 2.0. Rasmus has indicated they *may* play better together at that point. Currently, PHP 4.2.x with Apache 2 is experimental and should not be used in a production environment. We use it on our development server without trouble, but that server is

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-16 Thread Austin Gonyou
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 18:30, Gerard Samuel wrote: > I dont think Apache 2 or php 4.3.x are meant for production boxes.. > My opinion, the latest verion of apache 1.3.x and php 4.1.2 (my test > box > is 4.2.1 but thats ok) Apache2 is meant for production. Php 4.2.1 is meant for production.

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-15 Thread Gerard Samuel
I dont think Apache 2 or php 4.3.x are meant for production boxes.. My opinion, the latest verion of apache 1.3.x and php 4.1.2 (my test box is 4.2.1 but thats ok) Michael Hall wrote: >I've had a hunt through the mail archives but can't find a definite >answer: > >Is Apache 2.0.x and PHP 4.2.x/

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-15 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
> Is Apache 2.0.x and PHP 4.2.x/4.3.x on Linux a viable proposition yet in a > production environment? Nope -Rasmus -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-15 Thread Tyler Longren
In a production environment: no for fun: yes -- Tyler Longren Captain Jack Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.captainjack.com On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:13:41 +0930 (CST) Michael Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've had a hunt through the mail archives but can't find a definite > answer:

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 or 1.3 for php on windows XP ?

2002-06-10 Thread Thomas Edison Jr.
Ok... i'll go for 1.3.24 Thanks, T. Edison Jr. --- R'twick Niceorgaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > use apache 1.3.24.. > php has experimental support for apache 2.0.x.. so > don't trust it much > > - Original Message - > From: "Thomas Edison Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0

2002-04-11 Thread Andrew Scott
On 11 Apr 2002 at 14:37, Marcin Pasieka wrote: > How to install PHP on Apache 2.0 server? > As far as I can see, at the moment, the only way is to use cgi. It looks like that API stuff has to be rewritten/updated a little. However, since Apache 2 is now released, the API shouldn't be changing

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0

2002-04-11 Thread Tyler Longren
I suppose I might as well answer this question for the third or fourth time on this list: That's because PHP wasn't built to run with Apache 2.0.25. Apache has changed so much between the 2.0.xx releases that the php developers can't keep up with it. Wait until the next RC of PHP or the next st

[PHP] Re: PHP & Apache 2.0 - NOT WORKING ?

2001-03-07 Thread Benoit
Apache 2.0 seem to be now supported by PHP4.04pl1. I tried PHP4.0.4pl1 & Apache 2.0a8 (configure don't seem to work for me with 2.0a9) But. I did not succeded to make it working ! Do someone have a tips on some compiling flags working, or other versions ? Mine made apache to show a segmentati