On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, AmirBehzad Eslami
wrote:
> We have a bunch of SQL-queries, they should be executed in
> a sequential order, with a defensive programming style in mind.
>
> We were thinking to implement the solution as "Stored Procedures"
> instead of a PHP solution that runs SQL
Hi,
We were thinking to implement the solution as "Stored Procedures"
> instead of a PHP solution that runs SQL queries, but an article in
> Coding Horro recommendeds to avoid SP for good reasons:
The article shows only one thing. that common practice should be to 'do
everything where it belongs
Am 17.02.13 17:00, schrieb AmirBehzad Eslami:
> Dear list,
>
> We have a bunch of SQL-queries, they should be executed in
> a sequential order, with a defensive programming style in mind.
I don't understand what you want?
Queries are executed sequentially or do you plan to create a
multi-process PH
On 12/15/2011 01:05 PM, Alex Pojarsky wrote:
I'm not sure I've understood you correctly, but you may try something
like the following primitive autoloader (I didn't debug it, it's just
an example):
class Base
{
protected $_path = '';
public function construct($base_path)
{
I'm not sure I've understood you correctly, but you may try something
like the following primitive autoloader (I didn't debug it, it's just
an example):
class Base
{
protected $_path = '';
public function construct($base_path)
{
$this->_path = $base_path;
}
public func
Hi guys,
I try to applied your solutions but I have problems whit it. I need to
achieve this schema( -> is something like ../ it means that it is one
level up folder):
connec.php(class Connect MySql)->
select.php(class Select MySql) ->
-> mysql.ph
Sent from a handheld device
On 08-Dec-2011, at 11:14 PM, "Dominik Halvoník"
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask you for help. This days I am trying to build one of my
> applications. But I have problem which stopped me. I have folder whit php
> files like connect.php, delete.php etc. These f
On 8 Dec 2011, at 17:14, Dominik Halvoník wrote:
> I would like to ask you for help. This days I am trying to build one of my
> applications. But I have problem which stopped me. I have folder whit php
> files like connect.php, delete.php etc. These files contains classes named
> the same as files
Extended classes may have their own constructors which are implicitly
called, and as Jonathan mentioned, the constructor of any ancestors (ie. the
parent) must explicitly be called.
If the child (extended) class does NOT have it's own constructor method
defined, the parent's constructor is called.
Hey,
Constructors behave the same way as regular methods with inheritance,
you have to manually call the parent constructor, ie:
parent::__construct().
Regards,
Jonathan
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:45 PM, APseudoUtopia wrote:
> Hey list,
>
> I'm writing my own class which extends upon the Memcac
On Sunday 20 December 2009 1:08:46 pm you wrote:
> >> Maybe this would be the perfect opportunity for the php autoload
> >> functions...?
> >>
> >> Thanks for your help/thoughts/comments,
> >> dK
> >> `
> >
> > Yep, this is a textbook case for a proper autoload setup. And no,
> > cramming all of
On Sunday 20 December 2009 10:35:56 am Daniel Kolbo wrote:
> Hello PHPers,
>
> I have a collection of about 60 objects (class definitions). They are
> all very similar. They all share a substantial % of the same core. But
> they all have slight variations as well. The approach I took was to
> m
Set up autoloading:
http://php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.autoload.php
Cheers,
Rob.
Daniel Kolbo wrote:
Hello PHPers,
I have a collection of about 60 objects (class definitions). They are
all very similar. They all share a substantial % of the same core. But
they all have slight vari
Caner BULUT wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> You can use Eclipse with plugin PDT or Zend Studio. They can track your
> classes and methods. They can remember your methods and classes also they
> have code completion abilities.
>
> Thanks
> Caner.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Kolbo [mai
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Caner BULUT wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> You can use Eclipse with plugin PDT or Zend Studio. They can track your
> classes and methods. They can remember your methods and classes also they
> have code completion abilities.
>
> Thanks
> Caner.
>
> -Original Message
Hi Daniel,
You can use Eclipse with plugin PDT or Zend Studio. They can track your
classes and methods. They can remember your methods and classes also they
have code completion abilities.
Thanks
Caner.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kolbo [mailto:kolb0...@umn.edu]
Sent: 26 July 2009
One final update.
The way one sets the path to required files is very important. I found it is
best to use instead of relative paths.
Regards
Julian
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Julian Muscat Doublesin <
opensourc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Update.
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> First of all, thank yo
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Eddie Drapkin wrote:
> autoloading doesn't do anything but follow a set of logic rules to decide
> what file to require, so it doesn't mess with opcode caches at all.
umm.., right, but what do you think happens at the center of that logic ?
require / include ca
autoloading doesn't do anything but follow a set of logic rules to decide
what file to require, so it doesn't mess with opcode caches at all.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Tony Marston <
> t...@marston-home.demon.co.uk
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Tony Marston wrote:
>
> "Eddie Drapkin" wrote in message
> news:68de37340905280801m6964d355l2d6d8ef773f3b...@mail.gmail.com...
> > There's a huge difference between laziness and opting in to use an
> > incredibly useful (and easy to properly deploy) feature to sa
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 16:17 +0300, Olexandr Heneralov wrote:
> Hi!
> Do not use low-level AJAX.
> There are many frameworks for ajax (JQUERY).
> Try to use PHP frameworks like symfony, zend framework. They simplify your
> work.
>
>
> 2009/5/28 Lenin
>
> > 2009/5/28 kranthi
> >
> > >
> > >
> >
"Eddie Drapkin" wrote in message
news:68de37340905280801m6964d355l2d6d8ef773f3b...@mail.gmail.com...
> There's a huge difference between laziness and opting in to use an
> incredibly useful (and easy to properly deploy) feature to save myself
> time
> so that I can spend more time writing that
There's a huge difference between laziness and opting in to use an
incredibly useful (and easy to properly deploy) feature to save myself time
so that I can spend more time writing that structured and efficient code of
which you speak. And the problem with what you're saying is that you still
have
"Eddie Drapkin" wrote in message
news:68de37340905280737t3e1ad844y188ab8fa08f17...@mail.gmail.com...
> Your code might not, but you sure do! Spending all that time writing
> require statements = :(
If you are too lazy to write "require" statements then you are probably too
lazy to write readab
Your code might not, but you sure do! Spending all that time writing
require statements = :(
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Tony Marston wrote:
>
> wrote in message
> news:000e0cd6ad1a9f7d3d046af89...@google.com...
> > Two things:
> >
> > 1. Try using the fully qualified path (ie /var/www/fo
wrote in message
news:000e0cd6ad1a9f7d3d046af89...@google.com...
> Two things:
>
> 1. Try using the fully qualified path (ie /var/www/foo/bar.php instead of
> foo/bar.php)
> 2. Look at setting up autoloading so you don't need to manually include
> anyway. If you're going OOP, autoloading is a mu
2009/5/28 Olexandr Heneralov
> Hi!
> Do not use low-level AJAX.
> There are many frameworks for ajax (JQUERY).
> Try to use PHP frameworks like symfony, zend framework. They simplify your
> work.
>
>
> 2009/5/28 Lenin
>
> > 2009/5/28 kranthi
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > i recommend you firebug firefox
Hi!
Do not use low-level AJAX.
There are many frameworks for ajax (JQUERY).
Try to use PHP frameworks like symfony, zend framework. They simplify your
work.
2009/5/28 Lenin
> 2009/5/28 kranthi
>
> >
> >
> > i recommend you firebug firefox adddon (just go to the net tab and you
> > can see all
2009/5/28 kranthi
>
>
> i recommend you firebug firefox adddon (just go to the net tab and you
> can see all the details of the communication between client and
> server)
> and i find it helpful to use a standard javascript(jQuery in my case)
> library instead of highly limited plain javascript
Two things:
1. Try using the fully qualified path (ie /var/www/foo/bar.php instead of
foo/bar.php)
2. Look at setting up autoloading so you don't need to manually include
anyway. If you're going OOP, autoloading is a must!
On May 28, 2009 8:49am, kranthi wrote:
i never faced such a proble
i never faced such a problem and i can assure you that it will never
happen. try...
main.php
second.php
test
call main.php via AJAX and see the responseText.
many things can go wrong in your coding. dont come to the conclusion
that this particular thing is not working.
i recommend you firebug
Julian,
could you please show us an example of this problem?
--
João Cândido de Souza Neto
SIENS SOLUÃÃES EM GESTÃO DE NEGÃCIOS
Fone: (0XX41) 3033-3636 - JS
www.siens.com.br
"Julian Muscat Doublesin" escreveu na mensagem
news:5e0039ed0905280431o2e9d8036u217b0449eccd...@mail.gmail.com..
I don't think that PHP is good language for teaching OOP as many folks above
said. I have never programmed in OOP style but i plan to learn it. I started
in PHP but i was little confused and i am used to program in procedural way
in PHP, so i've decided to learn some pure OOP language. I am read
Dear my friend, Jim Lucas.
Thank you very much for your help. You've solved my problem one more time.
I really appreciate your help.
===
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:17:02 -0700
Jim Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Lucas wrote:
> > Patrik Hasibuan wrote:
> >> Dear Jim,
> >>
> >> thanks for your
Jim Lucas wrote:
Patrik Hasibuan wrote:
Dear Jim,
thanks for your help. I've modified my codes as you adviced.
But than the output is:
"
superclass koneksi dipanggil
koneksi berhasil
No results found
"
The column 'country' of table 'countries' already really contents
complete all contry name
Patrik Hasibuan wrote:
Dear Jim,
thanks for your help. I've modified my codes as you adviced.
But than the output is:
"
superclass koneksi dipanggil
koneksi berhasil
No results found
"
The column 'country' of table 'countries' already really contents complete all contry name from all over the
Dear Jim,
thanks for your help. I've modified my codes as you adviced.
But than the output is:
"
superclass koneksi dipanggil
koneksi berhasil
No results found
"
The column 'country' of table 'countries' already really contents complete all
contry name from all over the earth. How come the query
Patrik Hasibuan wrote:
Dear Jim,
You've solved my problem, Jim. Thank you very much.
Now, my code give the output as my expectation:
"
superclass koneksi dipanggil
koneksi berhasil
negara->
".
But come another problem, namely: the $negara is empty. I tried to read the documentation on
"
http
Dear Jim,
You've solved my problem, Jim. Thank you very much.
Now, my code give the output as my expectation:
"
superclass koneksi dipanggil
koneksi berhasil
negara->
".
But come another problem, namely: the $negara is empty. I tried to read the
documentation on
"
http://www.php.net/manual/en/
A few missing pieces in your code. Take a look below within your class. I
corrected it.
try also using include_once instead of require
and make sure that your error level and reporting are turned on so you can see
what is happening.
Patrik Hasibuan wrote:
Dear my friends,
This is the fi
> Theoritically if Class "koneksi" is being initialized than it
> prints "koneksi berhasil (connection succeeded)" but it doesn't.
What "does" it? Just nothing? No warnings at all? Possibly disabled?
so far
rob
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://w
what sort of error are you encountering ?
-nathan
On 8/15/07, Patrik Hasibuan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear my friends,
>
> This is the first time for me to use OOP concept of PHP. I wrote still a
> very simple codes but it doesn't work as my manual book taught. the book
> titled "MySQL/PHP
Stut wrote:
This is a question of design, not a question of whether to use OOP.
For example, in several of the sites I maintain I have classes that
inherit from a base class called Table. The base class provides a lot
of the basic methods for working on a table (think ActiveRecord). It
also ha
"Ed Lazor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:54 AM, Stut wrote:
>> Youch!! Your implementation seems to be focused on development
>> efficiency rather than runtime efficience. In all but rare research
>> projects this is backwards for a web-ba
"Ed Lazor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:35 AM, Tony Marston wrote:
>> What a coincidence! That's exactly my approach, but I've taken it one
>> step
>> further. I always start with a properly normalised database which I can
>> then
>> im
"Stut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ed Lazor wrote:
>> On Oct 12, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Stut wrote:
>>> If I then go on to create an admin interface for the users, I would
>>> create another completely separate class called UserCollection to handle
>>> more than one
"Stut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tony Marston wrote:
>> "Stut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> My general approach to designing a system is data-centric. I tend to
>>> start by defining the database schema since getting t
On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:54 AM, Stut wrote:
Youch!! Your implementation seems to be focused on development
efficiency rather than runtime efficience. In all but rare research
projects this is backwards for a web-based system. This is exactly
the practice I am trying to discourage. It's a well-
On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:35 AM, Tony Marston wrote:
What a coincidence! That's exactly my approach, but I've taken it
one step
further. I always start with a properly normalised database which I
can then
import into my daa dictionary application. From there I can press a
button
and create a c
On 10/13/06, Stut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ed Lazor wrote:
> ...Or is it something else entirely; I dunno, maybe
> UserCollection has a property defined as an array of User class? I
> think that's what people were saying earlier in the thread as being a
> "very bad thing" in terms of memory ut
Ed Lazor wrote:
On Oct 12, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Stut wrote:
If I then go on to create an admin interface for the users, I would
create another completely separate class called UserCollection to
handle more than one user. I may at that point choose to expose any
data-massaging methods in User to
Tony Marston wrote:
"Stut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My general approach to designing a system is data-centric. I tend to start
by defining the database schema since getting that clear in my head tends
to lead me to a decent design.
What a coincidence
"Stut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ed Lazor wrote:
>> On Oct 12, 2006, at 12:15 PM, Stut wrote:
>>> As such you cannot start designing a solution unless you know how the
>>> data/entities are going to be used.
>>
>> Doesn't this mean that your design breaks when
Please include the list when replying to that others may benefit (or
suffer) from the discussion.
Bruce Cowin wrote:
I like your static user class. Does the user instance then get saved to a
session variable that is serialized/unserialized on every page?
There is no user instance as such
On Oct 12, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Stut wrote:
You may end up refactoring code if your application changes that
much, but a good OO design should also mean that when changes of
that magnitude occur the changes required are limited to relatively
small sections of code.
Ok, I think we're using t
Ed Lazor wrote:
On Oct 12, 2006, at 12:15 PM, Stut wrote:
As such you cannot start designing a solution unless you know how the
data/entities are going to be used.
Doesn't this mean that your design breaks when the behavior or use of
the data/entities changes?
You may end up refactoring cod
""Richard Lynch"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, October 12, 2006 3:11 am, Tony Marston wrote:
>> I have to disagree as well. There is absolutely nothing wrong which
>> the
>> approach of creating one class for each table in the database. It
>> cannot be
>>
Comments / Questions below.
On Oct 12, 2006, at 12:15 PM, Stut wrote:
Except that is the attitude that leads to painful OOP in PHP. PHP
is not the same environment as C++.
The environment (classes, objects, etc) needs to be created and
destroyed with each request.
I definitely agree that P
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-10-12 16:29:09 -0500:
> On Thu, October 12, 2006 1:03 pm, Ed Lazor wrote:
> > On Oct 12, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Richard Lynch wrote:
> >> I can't architect a good OOP solution to a problem that hasn't been
> >> fully defined, any more than one can architect a house without
>
On Thu, October 12, 2006 1:03 pm, Ed Lazor wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Richard Lynch wrote:
>> I can't architect a good OOP solution to a problem that hasn't been
>> fully defined, any more than one can architect a house without
>> knowing
>> all the rooms that are needed...
>
> Sorry to
Ed Lazor wrote:
On Oct 12, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Richard Lynch wrote:
I can't architect a good OOP solution to a problem that hasn't been
fully defined, any more than one can architect a house without knowing
all the rooms that are needed...
Sorry to jump into the middle of the conversation, but
Richard Lynch wrote:
I *still* don't see OOP as a Right Answer for spitting out HTML web
pages in optimized minimalist time frames...
Maybe my brain just got warped by all that AI/Lisp work I did for a
couple decades, but it feels to me like a bad selection of weapons for
the task at hand, most
On Oct 12, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Richard Lynch wrote:
I can't architect a good OOP solution to a problem that hasn't been
fully defined, any more than one can architect a house without knowing
all the rooms that are needed...
Sorry to jump into the middle of the conversation, but I thought this
On Thu, October 12, 2006 8:24 am, Chris de Vidal wrote:
> [use the archives]
I can't architect a good OOP solution to a problem that hasn't been
fully defined, any more than one can architect a house without knowing
all the rooms that are needed...
I agree that all the code samples you provided be
On Thu, October 12, 2006 3:11 am, Tony Marston wrote:
> I have to disagree as well. There is absolutely nothing wrong which
> the
> approach of creating one class for each table in the database. It
> cannot be
> wrong for the simple reason THAT IT WORKS!
Only problem is that then you often end up
On Thu, October 12, 2006 12:49 am, Stut wrote:
> Roman Neuhauser wrote:
>> # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-10-11 21:28:36 +0100:
>>> Richard Lynch wrote:
On Tue, October 10, 2006 6:14 pm, Chris de Vidal wrote:
> I want to create a "customer" class which fetches its attributes
> from
> a
On Wed, October 11, 2006 3:28 pm, Stut wrote:
> Richard Lynch wrote:
>> On Tue, October 10, 2006 6:14 pm, Chris de Vidal wrote:
>>> I want to create a "customer" class which fetches its attributes
>>> from
>>> a MySQL database.
>>
>> No, you don't. :-)
>>
>> This is a classic example of the "obviou
By the way, about myself. I'm primarily a system administrator. Most of the
time I USE code, NOT
write it. But I also dabble, and right now we need to improve our old custom
PHP revenue
application which has sat stagnant for a few years. We can't afford a
full-time programmer and I
know enou
"Roman Neuhauser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
># [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-10-11 21:28:36 +0100:
>> Richard Lynch wrote:
>> >On Tue, October 10, 2006 6:14 pm, Chris de Vidal wrote:
>> >>I want to create a "customer" class which fetches its attributes from
>> >>a MyS
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-10-12 06:49:22 +0100:
> Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> ># [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-10-11 21:28:36 +0100:
> >>Richard Lynch wrote:
> >>>This is a classic example of the "obvious" OOP solution being wildly
> >>>inappropriate.
> >>Ok, so I now find myself in the unusual position o
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-10-11 21:28:36 +0100:
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Tue, October 10, 2006 6:14 pm, Chris de Vidal wrote:
I want to create a "customer" class which fetches its attributes from
a MySQL database.
No, you don't. :-)
This is a classic example of the "ob
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-10-11 21:28:36 +0100:
> Richard Lynch wrote:
> >On Tue, October 10, 2006 6:14 pm, Chris de Vidal wrote:
> >>I want to create a "customer" class which fetches its attributes from
> >>a MySQL database.
> >
> >No, you don't. :-)
> >
> >This is a classic example of the "obvio
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Tue, October 10, 2006 6:14 pm, Chris de Vidal wrote:
I want to create a "customer" class which fetches its attributes from
a MySQL database.
No, you don't. :-)
This is a classic example of the "obvious" OOP solution being wildly
inappropriate.
Ok, so I now find mysel
On Tue, October 10, 2006 6:14 pm, Chris de Vidal wrote:
> I want to create a "customer" class which fetches its attributes from
> a MySQL database.
No, you don't. :-)
This is a classic example of the "obvious" OOP solution being wildly
inappropriate.
The sad thing is, there are a zillion applica
- Original Message -
From: "Chris de Vidal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] OOP slow -- am I an idiot?
--- Johan Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You should look into getting Professional PHP5 by Lecky-
--- Larry Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For your rudimentary example of object-relational mapping below, yes,
> performance is going to be atrocious. That's because you're not taking any
> advantage of the features that using OOP gives you.
Well, I /thought/ I was taking advantage of bl
--- Johan Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You should look into getting Professional PHP5 by Lecky-Thompson,
> Eide-Goodman, Nowicki and Cove from WROX.
...
> The collection class in chapter 5 discusses a programming problem
> just like yours.
I will look into that, thank you.
CD
Think yo
On 10 Oct 2006, at 4:14 PM, Chris de Vidal wrote:
I think perhaps I'm using classes and OOP incorrectly. The last
time I used them, they were slow.
I want to create a "customer" class which fetches its attributes
from a MySQL database. Something
like this pseudocode:
class customer
For your rudimentary example of object-relational mapping below, yes,
performance is going to be atrocious. That's because you're not taking any
advantage of the features that using OOP gives you. One could write a
dissertation on this problem, but I will just give you some general
guidelines
Chris de Vidal wrote:
I think perhaps I'm using classes and OOP incorrectly. The last time I used
them, they were slow.
The examples you provided shows that it's not OOP that's the problem,
it's how your getting the data as you suspected.
Doing tons of queries is going to be slow whether y
On May 1, 2006, at 8:56 PM, chris smith wrote:
Depending on your content you could cache some of it to static files..
http://pear.php.net/packages.php?catpid=3&catname=Caching
(I'm sure there are tons more packages to do this as well)..
Yeah, that's what I'm looking at right now, although
On 5/2/06, Edward Vermillion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 1, 2006, at 3:53 PM, Richard Lynch wrote:
> On Mon, May 1, 2006 8:25 am, Edward Vermillion wrote:
>> What I was mainly thinking of though, what kind of hoops does PHP
>> jump through to take a class, that I assume it's holding in me
On May 1, 2006, at 3:53 PM, Richard Lynch wrote:
On Mon, May 1, 2006 8:25 am, Edward Vermillion wrote:
What I was mainly thinking of though, what kind of hoops does PHP
jump through to take a class, that I assume it's holding in memory,
and make an object out of it, aside from the constructor?
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Mon, May 1, 2006 8:25 am, Edward Vermillion wrote:
What I was mainly thinking of though, what kind of hoops does PHP
jump through to take a class, that I assume it's holding in memory,
and make an object out of it, aside from the constructor? Is it
doubling the memory co
On Mon, May 1, 2006 8:25 am, Edward Vermillion wrote:
> What I was mainly thinking of though, what kind of hoops does PHP
> jump through to take a class, that I assume it's holding in memory,
> and make an object out of it, aside from the constructor? Is it
> doubling the memory consumption, or mor
Thanks guys!
I guess it comes down to "Don't do anything stupid and you should be
fine" :D
I'm just still in the design stage, and since my past practice was
write/figure out what you did wrong why it doesn't work like it
should/rewrite, I'm trying to cover as many bases as I can from the
Edward Vermillion wrote:
On Apr 30, 2006, at 8:07 PM, Richard Lynch wrote:
Instantiating an object does have some extra overhead that the static
call bypasses.
How much overhead depends on the complexity of the object, I would
predict that it's mainly in its constructor and any parent
constru
On 5/1/06, Edward Vermillion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Apr 30, 2006, at 8:07 PM, Richard Lynch wrote:
> Instantiating an object does have some extra overhead that the static
> call bypasses.
>
> How much overhead depends on the complexity of the object, I would
> predict that it's mainly in
On Apr 30, 2006, at 8:07 PM, Richard Lynch wrote:
Instantiating an object does have some extra overhead that the static
call bypasses.
How much overhead depends on the complexity of the object, I would
predict that it's mainly in its constructor and any parent
constructors.
Well there's a b
Instantiating an object does have some extra overhead that the static
call bypasses.
How much overhead depends on the complexity of the object, I would
predict that it's mainly in its constructor and any parent
constructors.
I can't speak to differences in PHP4/PHP5 in this specific regard, but
w
Jochem Maas wrote:
me I'm just slow - I still on 'how the f*** do I use branches in CVS'
after using it for 18 months+; and I haven't even begun to look at
subversion
yet :-P
I strongly suggest you skip branches in CVS and go straight to
subversion. I've been using CVS for years and have att
Edward Vermillion wrote:
On Apr 30, 2006, at 10:45 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
CVS or subversion (and 3 weeks intensive study of what branches are)
might
be of help to you - not for the faint-hearted though!
Been reading the subversion manual for the past three days... ;)
(I'm a slow reader
On Apr 30, 2006, at 10:45 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
CVS or subversion (and 3 weeks intensive study of what branches
are) might
be of help to you - not for the faint-hearted though!
Been reading the subversion manual for the past three days... ;)
(I'm a slow reader)
Ed
--
PHP General Mail
Edward Vermillion wrote:
On Apr 30, 2006, at 10:10 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
Edward Vermillion wrote:
I'm still trying to get my head around all the OOP stuff and was
wondering if there is any basic difference between calling a static
function as opposed to creating an object, in situation
On Apr 30, 2006, at 10:10 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
Edward Vermillion wrote:
I'm still trying to get my head around all the OOP stuff and was
wondering if there is any basic difference between calling a
static function as opposed to creating an object, in situations
where both methods wil
Edward Vermillion wrote:
I'm still trying to get my head around all the OOP stuff and was
wondering if there is any basic difference between calling a static
function as opposed to creating an object, in situations where both
methods will do the same thing for you. Is there any overhead to
would have to be.
http://smileaf.org/bob.php
as you can see it's working great.
did make few more changes:
class Test {
public $saying = "";
function __construct() {
Bob,
'wrapping' you class definition within HTML like you have done is
not only weird but down right ugly. I recommend sticking each class
you write in a seperate file and using include_once() or require_once()
before you output anything to the browser. basically try to
seperate you code into 'st
On 2005-10-21 06:17, Stephen Leaf wrote:
most likely var is depreciated in php5. (can someone confirm this?)
Well, if I try to use Var in a class i get this message:
Strict Standards: var: Deprecated. Please use the
public/private/protected modifiers in C:\code\test\var.php on line 3*
/*
Here is the working code
You had __constructor() it's __construct()
notice I also moved your saying declaration outside of the constructor.
this is to make it a class level variable.
the way that you had it set it was only in scope until you finished the
construct code.
I guess I was wrong about
1 - 100 of 229 matches
Mail list logo
