Re: [PHP] Apache 2 on RedHat

2004-12-01 Thread Thomas Goyne
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:13:37 -0800, Bart Baenisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I believe I understand the thread unsafeness problem, and I think a reasonable cure is the prefork MPM for Apache 2, as RedHat distributes. If we decide to avoid the work of removing the Apache 2.whatever that RedHa

Re: [PHP] apache 2, mysql 5.0.1.rpm and php 5.0.2 on RH9

2004-11-09 Thread Haseeb Iqbal
- From: "Greg Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 12:52 AM Subject: Re: [PHP] apache 2, mysql 5.0.1.rpm and php 5.0.2 on RH9 > On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 07:19:30 +0500, Haseeb Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: [PHP] apache 2, mysql 5.0.1.rpm and php 5.0.2 on RH9

2004-11-08 Thread Greg Donald
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 07:19:30 +0500, Haseeb Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > /usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.a(net.o)(.text+0x9d0): first defined here > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make: *** [libphp5.la] Error 1 Does /usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.a actually exist? After you installed MySQ

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and php 5 compatibility

2004-09-23 Thread Jordi Canals
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:33:54 +0200, Bostjan Skufca @ domenca.com > We use php4 and php5 with apache2 on production servers without any problem > (prefork MPM). I also have PHP 5 and Apache 2 running on some servers, as I need some Apache Modules that are only available for Apache 2 ... Also, I r

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and php 5 compatibility

2004-09-23 Thread Bostjan Skufca @ domenca.com
We use php4 and php5 with apache2 on production servers without any problem (prefork MPM). worker MPM could be a problem though... regrds, Bostjan On Thursday 23 of September 2004 10:28, Frédéric Hardy wrote: > Hello - > > I known that using apache 2 with php 4.x is not a good idea, because >

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP for Production?

2004-07-27 Thread Marten Lehmann
Hello, And following the last line - I'm still running Apache2 with PHP5 on Windows on an increasing number of sites, without a single problem to date ;) I switched to Apache 2 and PHP 5.0.0 a week ago and hand no problems so far (several hundred thousand hits each day). Apache 2 is running in

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP for Production?

2004-07-20 Thread Oliver John Tibi
Would it be just fine if I activated Apache2's 'prefork' module? I know preforking defeats Apache2 purpose, but I am still wondering if it should still work fine. :) "Lester Caine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oliver John V. Tibi wrote: > > > Wow! And come to think

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP for Production?

2004-07-20 Thread Steve Wardell
Why is there such a reluctance to using Apache 2? For stability issues, PHP should recommend Apache 2 but in prefork mode. Instead of saying Apache 2 is unsupported, just say non prefork mode is not supported. Additionally, if PHP is more acceptable of Apache 2 (in the supported mode), then use

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP for Production?

2004-07-20 Thread raditha dissanayake
Curt Zirzow wrote: Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using PHP and apache 2 on a production server and it just had too many problems. And for a longer explaination: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-dev&m=108736540021355&w=2 It was this or another message b

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP for Production?

2004-07-19 Thread Lester Caine
Oliver John V. Tibi wrote: Wow! And come to think of it, how did you do it? Or should I stick with Apache1 until there is a viable solution to this upgrade dilemma? When I started playing with this, I had a windows machine onto which I tried installing Apache1. After a couple of days of frustratio

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP for Production?

2004-07-19 Thread Curt Zirzow
* Thus wrote Oliver John V. Tibi: > Wow! And come to think of it, how did you do it? Or should I stick with > Apache1 until there is a viable solution to this upgrade dilemma? I would stay with stick with apache 1.x. The only reason I would consider apache2 is if there was a module only available

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP for Production?

2004-07-19 Thread Oliver John V. Tibi
Wow! And come to think of it, how did you do it? Or should I stick with Apache1 until there is a viable solution to this upgrade dilemma? -- Running 'ojtibi' on '127.0.0.1' (BATCH_OPTIMISTIC mode). "Live free() or die()." "Lester Caine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP for Production?

2004-07-19 Thread Matthew Sims
> On Tuesday 20 July 2004 03:22, Marten Lehmann wrote: > >> Why shouldn't I use PHP 5.0.0 with Apache 2.0.50? > > You can, if it works for you, but ... > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-general&m=107916708217647&w=2 > > -- > Jason Wong -> Gremlins Associates -> www.gremlins.biz Apache2 had

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP for Production?

2004-07-19 Thread Jason Wong
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 03:22, Marten Lehmann wrote: > Why shouldn't I use PHP 5.0.0 with Apache 2.0.50? You can, if it works for you, but ... http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-general&m=107916708217647&w=2 -- Jason Wong -> Gremlins Associates -> www.gremlins.biz Open Source Software Syste

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP for Production?

2004-07-19 Thread Marten Lehmann
Hi, I just wanted to post almost the same question: PHP for Apache 2 is idling around for years now. configure --with-apxs2 is still marked as [EXPERIMENTAL] and the documentation still warns: "Do not use Apache 2.0 and PHP in a production environment neither on Unix nor on Windows." What is t

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP for Production?

2004-07-19 Thread Lester Caine
Chris Hayes wrote: And for a longer explaination: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-dev&m=108736540021355&w=2 Very well explained. Untill now this problem was explained to me with a lot of techno mumbo jumbo, and I could not make sense of it. But now I think I really understand what's going o

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP for Production?

2004-07-19 Thread Chris Hayes
At 18:55 19-7-04, you wrote: > >I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says > >Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments. > > > > > Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using > PHP and apache 2 on a production server and it just

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP for Production?

2004-07-19 Thread Curt Zirzow
* Thus wrote raditha dissanayake: > Oliver John V. Tibi wrote: > > >Hi! > > > >I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says > >Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments. > > > > > Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using > PH

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP for Production?

2004-07-19 Thread raditha dissanayake
Oliver John V. Tibi wrote: Hi! I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments. Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using PHP and apache 2 on a production server and it just had too many

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 w/ PHP database sessions

2004-03-26 Thread Christopher Ditty
Thanks Chris. I just compared the trans_sid on the dev box and it is set to 1. I'll make that change and report in. Many thanks. Owe you another beer if that was it. ;) Chris >>> "Chris Shiflett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/26/04 10:41AM >>> --- Christopher Ditty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I re

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 w/ PHP database sessions

2004-03-26 Thread Chris Shiflett
--- Christopher Ditty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I recently upgraded to apache 2.0 from 1.23.x on my server. 1.3.x you mean? :-) > The sessions are still working, however, the session information is > not being transfered via the url. [snip] > session.use_trans_sid = 0 There's your answer.

RE: [PHP] Apache 2 + PHP

2003-12-06 Thread Yves Arsenault
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: December 6, 2003 9:17 AM To: Yves Arsenault; PHP-General Subject: Re: [PHP] Apache 2 + PHP Yves: I am not sure of the exact technical issues that affect it, but when I was forced to use it in a production environment (does anyone actually admit to CHOOSING to use it

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 + PHP

2003-12-06 Thread Mike Morton
-Original Message- > From: Martin Hudec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 5 décembre 2003 10:52 > To: PHP-General > Subject: Re: [PHP] Apache 2 + PHP > > > Hi there, > > when I had Gentoo Linux, I was using Apache 2.0.48 with PHP 4.3.4 installed > from Gentoo

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 + PHP

2003-12-06 Thread Seung Hwan Kang
ould anyone know of the issues that might affect PHP 4.3.4 and Apache 2.0.48 ? Thanks, Yves -Original Message- From: Martin Hudec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 5 décembre 2003 10:52 To: PHP-General Subject: Re: [PHP] Apache 2 + PHP Hi there, when I had Gentoo Linux, I was using Apache 2

RE: [PHP] Apache 2 + PHP

2003-12-05 Thread Yves Arsenault
Would anyone know of the issues that might affect PHP 4.3.4 and Apache 2.0.48 ? Thanks, Yves -Original Message- From: Martin Hudec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 5 décembre 2003 10:52 To: PHP-General Subject: Re: [PHP] Apache 2 + PHP Hi there, when I had Gentoo Linux, I was using

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 + PHP

2003-12-05 Thread Martin Hudec
Hi there, when I had Gentoo Linux, I was using Apache 2.0.48 with PHP 4.3.4 installed from Gentoo portage. It was running <10 smallscale php/mysql based virtualhosts without any difficulties. On Friday 05 December 2003 15:24, Yves Arsenault wrote: > Is this warning outdated? > http://www.php.ne

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.*

2003-11-24 Thread Martin Hudec
Yep I forgot to mention that it is off by default :). Hmmm nice to know that there is shorter name :). Thanks for info, I haven't used PHP for long time. On Monday 24 November 2003 17:13, Chris Shiflett wrote: > To add to this, if register_globals is disabled by default, it is likely > that you'r

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.*

2003-11-24 Thread Chris Shiflett
--- Martin Hudec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what you're looking for is called Register Globals which is turned > off, therefore you just cannot use $variable but must use > $HTTP_POST_VARS['variable']. To add to this, if register_globals is disabled by default, it is likely that you're using a v

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.*

2003-11-24 Thread Martin Hudec
Hello, what you're looking for is called Register Globals which is turned off, therefore you just cannot use $variable but must use $HTTP_POST_VARS['variable']. It is turned off for security reasons and can be usually find in php.ini file (ask your system administrator). On Monday 24 Novembe

RE: [PHP] Apache 2.*

2003-11-24 Thread Jay Blanchard
[snip] Forgive me if you've already addressed this, I'm trying to post some variable to a php sript and they just arn't registering if i use the code below it get's the variable and it's contents "; reset ($HTTP_POST_VARS); while (list ($key, $val) = each ($HTTP_POST_VARS)) { echo "$key =>

RE: [PHP] Apache 2.x and PHP

2003-07-23 Thread Brad Young
We have a detailed whitepaper on the subject. Please check out: http://www.zend.com/whitepapers/PHPandApache2-ZendWhitepaper.pdf BY __ Brad Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.zend.com Zend - The PHP Company > >Hi All, > >Can anyone aswer this simple question, that i stil

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP 4.2.3.

2002-11-16 Thread Danny Shepherd
In short - looks as if your version of Apache 2 is out of date. You're using a version from 28th June, the PHP dll was built against a version from 3rd September. Danny. - Original Message - From: "Horst Gassner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 16, 20

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP

2002-11-07 Thread conbud
Hi, I use Apache 2.0.4 and PHP 4.2.3 on Mandrake Linux and Win XP. On Linux its been extremely stable and havnt had a single problem yet, on XP I have a few minor problems to where the PHP was executing slow but nothing majorly noticable. "Davy Obdam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:0

RE: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP

2002-11-07 Thread Johnson, Kirk
Thanks for your reply, Davy. We are running *nix boxes, so I don't have any thoughts on XP and Apache. Kirk > -Original Message- > From: Davy Obdam [mailto:info@;davyobdam.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 3:29 PM > To: Johnson, Kirk; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subje

RE: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP

2002-11-07 Thread Davy Obdam
Hi Kirk,. I run apache 2.0.40 and PHP 4.2.3 without no problem on my windows XP machine. I use it for testing, but i would think its stable enough for a production environment aswell. I actualy think that on a win32 platform Apache 2 is a better choice instead of 1.3.x. Whats your opinion about th

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP

2002-11-07 Thread Maxim Maletsky
I heard mentioning a few more month for them to get working stably. -- Maxim Maletsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Johnson, Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... : > Last I heard, PHP and Apache 2 were not yet ready for production > environments. Are there any further updates? > > What is the best way t

Re: [PHP] Apache 2 support broken?

2002-07-23 Thread Aaron Gould
Here's how to get it to work (thanks to somebody on Google Groups)... 1. Open up the file php_functions.c in /sapi/apache2filter/ 2. Change MODULE_MAGIC_AT_LEAST to AP_MODULE_MAGIC_AT_LEAST (Note the addition of "AP_") 3. Save the php_functions.c file and try running configure again -- Aar