Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-16 Thread Austin Gonyou
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 18:30, Gerard Samuel wrote: > I dont think Apache 2 or php 4.3.x are meant for production boxes.. > My opinion, the latest verion of apache 1.3.x and php 4.1.2 (my test > box > is 4.2.1 but thats ok) Apache2 is meant for production. Php 4.2.1 is meant for production.

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-15 Thread Gerard Samuel
I dont think Apache 2 or php 4.3.x are meant for production boxes.. My opinion, the latest verion of apache 1.3.x and php 4.1.2 (my test box is 4.2.1 but thats ok) Michael Hall wrote: >I've had a hunt through the mail archives but can't find a definite >answer: > >Is Apache 2.0.x and PHP 4.2.x/

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-15 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
> Is Apache 2.0.x and PHP 4.2.x/4.3.x on Linux a viable proposition yet in a > production environment? Nope -Rasmus -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-15 Thread Tyler Longren
In a production environment: no for fun: yes -- Tyler Longren Captain Jack Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.captainjack.com On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:13:41 +0930 (CST) Michael Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've had a hunt through the mail archives but can't find a definite > answer:

[PHP] Apache 2.0 + PHP

2002-07-15 Thread Michael Hall
I've had a hunt through the mail archives but can't find a definite answer: Is Apache 2.0.x and PHP 4.2.x/4.3.x on Linux a viable proposition yet in a production environment? I guess the diversity of experiences described in the archives probably means no, but what is the current opinion? Some