Putting your session-ID into post will require you to POST every page,
rather then GET it. And every anchor user clicks will have to POST, not GET.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:32 PM, wrote:
> You should at least check the IP of the client additionally to have some
> prove
> it is the same client y
Something like:
$cleanData = array_map(function($str){return strtolower(trim($str));},
$passedData);
--
The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a
programmer is doing until it’s too late. ~Seymour Cray
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:29 PM, George Langley wrote:
> Hi all. I want t
Hey.
Depends on your customisation needs. If you need something robust and don't
need anything very specific - you should be ok with Drupal, Joomla or
something similar. If you are going to need a lot of complex internals that
are not in these engines - you may want to try some lightweight flexibl
would really appreciate if the patch would be included and hopefully
also some other people.
Regards,
ALeX.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Threading doesn't increase complexity? Spoken truly like somebody who has
not had to actually write, test and debug proper, high performance threaded
code. Please tell me how threading doesn't increase complexity of any data
structure?
I may agree if you talk about php running in cli, but then the
You do all that in the context of a single PHP instance and linear code,
calling curl_multi handles its own threading, you just get back results,
you dont have to store it anywhere outside PHP memory space, and you can
configure timeouts and all that stuff, or you can regulate it yourself. The
data
>
>
> That's all understood but there are times when that one request from
> the visitor requires many sub-requests like connection to DB and
> making SOAP calls.
I would say it's more than just "there are times", that's how a typical
script lives, it imports libraries, queries the database, and
will introduce new places where php apps fail, new security concerns, etc,
and I think we are far from having current issues fixed...
Want to parallelize your PHP execution? Learn to love curl_multi :)
In this case, fix the program, not the programming language. Just my $0.02
-- Alex
--
The troubl
ant to use PHP for this to begin with. I
mean sure you can write your own vfat implementation in PHP, etc, etc,
but it doesn't mean that it's a good idea to do so.
-- Alex
--
The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a
programmer is doing until it’s too late. ~Seymour Cray
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Maybe anyone can point me in the right direction.
I need to modify this patch
http://www.phpbuilder.com/lists/php-developer-list/2000101/0994.php
and replace VIRTUAL_DOCUMENT_ROOT with real path.
As described in patch note - "When using mod_vhost_alias the
DOCUMENT_ROOT = PATH_TRANSLATED -
SCRIPT
I understand what performance issues this brings, but as for security
was just a bit curious. You have just showed me what I was thinking
about, but you wrote it much better, clear and structured.
Thank you.
2012/3/26 Stuart Dallas :
> On 26 Mar 2012, at 17:41, Alex Pojarsky wrote:
>
>
Now, as the issue adressed and script removed, can you please explain
what exactly are the issues of using such approach? I mean security
ones, not performance.
2012/3/26 Lester Caine :
> Curtis Maurand wrote:
>>
>> rsync is your friend.
>
> and is even available for windows machines ...
>
> --
>
Just a few notes on the previous responses.
Delaying with JavaScript, like validating with JavaScript is a rather
pointless endeavor. Think about it, you are putting your "limiting"
mechanism, on the hackers' computer... You can still post to your
server as fast as you want.
With regards to using
You don't need to store it in the database as b64, just undo the
encoding into your inputs
for the purpose of the explanation, this is language independent
b64e - encoding function
b64d - decoding function
pseudo code
given:
bad_num = ') union select * from foo --'
bad_str = ""
good_num = 1234
> question 1
>
> If you use the PHP filters & sanitizations, and you plan on using PDO
> with binded params, are you absolutely safe? And if not, why? What are
> the other ways for them to still make it in - even with PD0 and binded
> params properly in place? Just curious.
There are no known expl
Absolutely agreed. A part of what i was asking deals with what he is
actually doing...
--
The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a
programmer is doing until it’s too late. ~Seymour Cray
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On 12-01-23 09:29 PM, A
programmer is doing until it’s too late. ~Seymour Cray
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On 12-01-23 01:32 PM, Alex Nikitin wrote:
>>
>> If you don't mind me asking, if you want performance, which is kind of
>> essential if you are processing a larg
Start off with the fact that that article is from 2006, and its
written by a programmer...
> I was simply asking expert opinion with the intention to learn.
> There is so much docs out there (I mean not just out there but at top
> security sites like owasp ) that recommends database specific escap
Rasmus confirmed that they are having issues with php.net:
You can use the sk.php.net mirror while they fix their problems, as
well as docs.php.net.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
If you don't mind me asking, if you want performance, which is kind of
essential if you are processing a large number of files, why are you
doing it in PHP?
--
The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a
programmer is doing until it’s too late. ~Seymour Cray
--
PHP General Mai
Can't get to doc at all here...
--
The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a
programmer is doing until it’s too late. ~Seymour Cray
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
There is so much no, answers are in line.
> At the top of each php page which interacts with a database, just have
> this one liner
This has already been mentioned, but again, no, no connection if you
are not actually interacting with the database.
> $DBH = safe_connection("database_name_here");
continue (like a secret random password stored in the session), just a
simple time-out won't solve the issue.
Both used together should provide for a good way to stop any useful
spamming done with your script.
~ Alex
--
The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a
prog
tever words you allow, and you
have to allow certain words for your queries to run ;)
Anyways, hopefully this is something for you guys to think about and
hopefully enough to stop suggesting escaping as a viable option to
stop any sort of simple code injection...
~ Alex
--
The trouble with progr
I'm not sure I've understood you correctly, but you may try something
like the following primitive autoloader (I didn't debug it, it's just
an example):
class Base
{
protected $_path = '';
public function construct($base_path)
{
$this->_path = $base_path;
}
public func
other approaches beyond Apache and PHP.
>
>So any ideas out there?
>
> Thanks for the help
> Thomas Dineen
That sounds like the kind of thing Java Web Start does. There's lots on
Google about it.
http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/javaws/
-Alex
it's only marginally faster, but it does look a bit cleaner, and is a
bit more memory efficient:
$records[] = unserialize(serialize($boundParams));
--
The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a
programmer is doing until it’s too late. ~Seymour Cray
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at
MySQL real escape string doesn't work, it's a bad solution to the
problem that has been with the internets since the very beginning, and
if people program like they are taught to by books, doesn't look like
it's going away any time soon. The problem of course is that various
programming languages
You can use a limit with a nested select, you just can't use it in
some cases, like inside an "IN" statement, but something like this
should work:
SELECT id, data, etc FROM table JOIN (SELECT special_id as id FROM
special_table ORDER BY special_id LIMIT 0, 1000) AS table2 USING (id)
Note: syntax
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Marco Lanzotti wrote:
> Il 13/09/2011 20:58, Alex Nikitin ha scritto:
> > Correction on Marco's post. You can absolutely stop a mysql query
>
> I know I can stop a query, but I don't know how to realize HTTP client
> has closed conne
+1 on terminal.
For gui-based ones, i like to be able to syntax check my code and run it
from within the editor window, tabs for dozens of files i usually have open
at once, highlight that supports many languages as i can be working on many
at once (php, css, js, ruby, python, C, lua, sql, for the
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 21:34, Alex Nikitin wrote:
> > And this will be faster or at least more efficient with a limit (e.g.
> limit
> > 50) this way when you have found the 50 users in the "in" statement, you
Absolutely, it was only a minor correction of a sub-point.
--
The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a programmer is
doing until it’s too late. ~Seymour Cray
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Jim Lucas wrote:
> On 9/13/2011 11:58 AM, Alex Nikitin wrote:
> > On
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:40 AM, linuxsupport wrote:
> I enabled debug in log and found this in the log file
>
> [13-Sep-2011 17:03:19.966801] DEBUG: pid 16974, fpm_got_signal(), line 76:
> received SIGCHLD
> [13-Sep-2011 17:03:19.966832] WARNING: pid 16974, fpm_children_bury(), line
> 252: [pool
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Jim Lucas wrote:
> On 9/12/2011 7:40 AM, Marco Lanzotti wrote:
> > Hi all, I'm new in the list and I already have a question for you.
> > I'm running an heavy query on my DB in a PHP script called by AJAX.
> > Because client often abort AJAX connection to ask a n
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Steve Staples wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 09:48 -0700, David Harkness wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Ashley Sheridan
> > wrote:
> >
> > > SELECT * FROM table WHERE userID IN (1,2,3,4,5,etc)
> > >
> >
> > +1. And this is a great place to use implode
If you have to ask these questions, i don't think you should be the person
to do it, i'm sorry.
I wouldn't recommend doing it on a mac, or even one single box, i wouldnt
recommend doig it on non-server hardware, infact most of the time i would
recommend you just buy already pre-sertup servers so t
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Ron Piggott wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone
>
> I am trying to load an HTML book into mySQL. The book was distributed with
> each chapter being it’s own HTML file.
>
> The only way I know how to open a file is by specifying the file name.
> Such as:
>
> $myFile = "B01C00
Sorry but escaping doesnt protect against mysql injection either, it is not
a good answer, nor does it really work, its an effort, yes, buuut in unicode
world we pretty much have the ability to override what it means to be a
character through best guess matching, etc, iiit just doesnt quite work;
e
It would be easier and faster to convert your string to lower case, than
perform the upper operation on every entry in the database. Also, just to
point it out, your code is very vulnerable to SQL injection.
But the suggestion is right, dump the query to make sure its correct, and
check for mysql
27;t work, if you don't believe me, listen to the keynote
that Dan Kaminsky gave at the last HOPE conference, he gives a good overview
of why... Please either use parameterized queries, or the awesome hack that
is base 64, don't assume that just because the function is called
mysql_real_escape
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Donovan Brooke wrote:
> Alex Nikitin wrote:
> [snip]
>
> There is code obfuscation with PHP, and you can compile it into C++ with
>> HipHop for php for example...
>>
> [snip]
>
>
> Of course, obfuscation is never a great secu
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Donovan Brooke wrote:
> Alex Nikitin wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Also you shouldn't actually encrypt passwords, the proper way to store
>> them
>> is hashed, so that if someone grabs your database, they dont have your
>> pa
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> **
> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 15:35 -0400, Alex Nikitin wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Ashley Sheridan
> wrote:
>
> > **
> > On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 22:02 +0300, Andre Polykanine wrote:
> >
&g
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> **
> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 22:02 +0300, Andre Polykanine wrote:
>
> Hello Alex,
>
> Thanks for the tip. I'm not storing it in the database (you see, it's
> "asdfasdf" and the key string is
I have a neat class you can play with...
--
The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a programmer is
doing until it’s too late. ~Seymour Cray
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Alex Nikitin wrote:
> Yes, since it's trying to represent in characters some purely bin
Yes, since it's trying to represent in characters some purely binary data,
it is not unlikely that you will get VERY weird characters (and you do).
Also you shouldn't actually encrypt passwords, the proper way to store them
is hashed, so that if someone grabs your database, they dont have your
pas
There are databases with area codes for the first 3, so you only have to
generate 1 million. Why do you need to store all of them again?
On Jul 31, 2011 4:06 PM, "Jason Pruim" wrote:
> No I'm not looking for your phone number... Or for the guy/girl whose
number you thought you got last night at th
Just as a word of caution to everyone on this list, mcrypt version of
blowfish (which is implemented by php) (in linux) has an 8bit bug in it, and
thus should not be used for hashing passwords even as backup. Basically if
you use a character such as say a British pound in your password, blowfish
wi
That would be so extreemely inefficient both resources and bandwidth-wise,
however an interesting thought...
On Jul 27, 2011 4:02 AM, "Pete Ford" wrote:
> On 26/07/11 18:20, alekto wrote:
>> Hi,
>> is there a way to create a tree menu list only by using php/html/css?
>> I found some, but they are
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> **
> On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 09:51 -0400, Alex Nikitin wrote:
>
> It would still be quicker with shell tools, imho, granted that some command
> line elitistry would be required... Also if you are going to be doing strin
doing until it’s too late. ~Seymour Cray
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan
wrote:
> On 07/22/2011 06:56 PM, Alex Nikitin wrote:
> >
> >
> > Or you could just grep the directory, not saying you have to do this,
> > but this was kind of fun to write an
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan
wrote:
> On 07/22/2011 11:21 AM, Andreas Moroder wrote:
> > Hallo,
> >
> > I have a PHP application made of many files ( php, images etc. )
> > I have a strong suspicion that many of the files in the application
> > directory are no more in use,
if( $val !== "with" && $val !== "from")
simple comparison = faster solution... also you want type-safe
you could do something like
if(!in_array($val, array("from","with"))) but its neither elegant nor fast
On Jul 14, 2011 12:22 AM, "Ron Piggott"
wrote:
nyways, just my $.02
With Regards...
--Alex
On Jul 13, 2011 9:15 PM, "Florian Müller" wrote:
If you were to use the proper object form of it, you'd spot the mistake, as it
will tell you that you are trying to perform an action on a non-object.
It might be a bug, or the developers might not have cared figuring that if you
threw it in an if(!...) it would validate as false anyways. But i
Actually if you want a very simple way, with a little JS, you can b64 encode
the file and fill in the file field in the form with it (you can hide it or
dynamically tack it on or something), so that you get everything when you
submit the form including the file (you just gotta make a file back out
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:37 AM, matty jones wrote:
> I have a mediawiki extension that allows me to design a form in the wiki to
> facilitate data entry into the wiki and it works good except that I also
> want to be able to up load images and take the file location/name and enter
> that into the
hould
get out of, use ===, its much safer .
Also try the same algorithm on 10 arrays of some number of values
10-1000 perhaps, that would give you better performance statistics :)
-- Alex
--
The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a programmer is
doing until it’s too
If you don't need the location, you can implode the array and use preg
match, quickly testing it, that gives you about 4.5 times performance
increase, but it wont give you the location, only if a certain value exists
within the array... You can kind of do some really clever math to get your
search
What do you mean by "fuzzy search"? Like an approximate search, and instead
of you stepping through the array, you guesstimate where to start, or search
for approximate string value in an array of strings?
--
The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a programmer is
doing until
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Al wrote:
> How can I prevent access to all files in a directory except one with an
> htaccess file.
>
> I've tried several approaches found with Googling; but, none seem to work.
>
> e.g.,
>
> Order Allow,Deny
> Deny from all
>
>
> This seems to me as it shoul
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Joshua Kehn wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Alex Nikitin wrote:
>
> > There is an interesting note in the comments for strcmp:
> > "Well, I am using PHP 4.0 and both strcmp and strcasecmp appear to be
> giving me very a
-
From: "tedd"
To: "Joshua Kehn" , "PHP General"
Subject: [PHP] A Review Request
Date: Sat, May 21, 2011 9:26 am
At 2:49 PM -0400 5/19/11, Joshua Kehn wrote:
>On May 19, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Andre Polykanine wrote:
>
>> Hello Alex,
>>
>>
@David
Fair enough, then i have seen so many badly designed sewage systems, that
the backed up sewage monsters come to me in my dreams... :) wait no the
other one :(
@Paul
And my girlfriend, apparently
--
The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a programmer is
doing until it’
apons prepares
them for the battlefield...
Alex
--
The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a programmer is
doing until it’s too late. ~Seymour Cray
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, tedd wrote:
> At 11:11 AM -0400 5/20/11, Alex Nikitin wrote:
>
>> Also to tedd,
, 2, PREG_SPLIT_OFFSET_CAPTURE);
$exponent = decbin((-$tmp[1][1])+127);
}
$f = bindec($exponent.$significand);
return (!$sign) ? $f : $f^0x;
}
I guess the function name and variable names will offer some assistance in
determining what this does, but i think its an interest
ed sorting functions, so it's not really worth any more of my
time, but it was kind of fun to figure out how to do all of that, especially
converting signed ints and floats to positive ints and back :)
-- Alex --
--
The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a programmer is
doing
erver messes up
i look at code
i'm still SOL... no keys, so your "protected" area is still protected
--
The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a programmer is
doing until it’s too late. ~Seymour Cray
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:57 PM, tedd wrote:
> At 2:
hus did
not fulfil its primary duty, in today's web world some security is not any
better then no security, protecting against regular users is pointless as
they are not the ones who will try to break your system ;)
Just my $.02
-- Alex
The trouble with programmers is that you can ne
=== or preg_match for me, lol, unless its all just math :)
--
The trouble with programmers is that you can never tell what a programmer is
doing until it’s too late. ~Seymour Cray
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Joshua Kehn wrote:
> On May 19, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Alex Nikitin wr
s types, it would
work well as well. Infact if you dont need to determing anything about the
string, i would suggest using the === operator as it is significantly
faster:
timed: 0m0.724s
wrote:
> Hello Alex,
>
> Two (stupid?) questions:
> 1. Why PHP_SELF is better than SCRIPT_NAME?
t,
it does not allow you to insecurely interpolate, and it does use prepared
statements for everything, i am sharing it with anyone who wants to look at
it...
Anyways, here's a direct link:
http://c2047862.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/Friday%20Keynote%20-%20Dan%20Kaminsky.mp3
Enjoy,
AND ($password== $pw))
+$pw='1a91d62f7ca67399625a4368a6ab5d4a3baa6073'; //sha1 hash of the
password: php -r "echo sha1(\"pw\");"
+if (@strcmp($id, $_POST['user_id']) == 0 && strcmp($pw,
sha1($_POST['password'])) == 0)
-- Alex --
--
The tro
Best way to learn about security of something is to learn how to break it...
On Apr 8, 2011 3:55 PM, "Jay Blanchard" wrote:
>
> [snip]
> whats the best way to learn about security in php?
> [/snip]
>
> Study, study, study!
>
> Chris Shiflett is a recognized expert on PHP security -
> http://shifl
, and less bandwidth. If you include the JS file with php, every time
you request the page the javascript will be pulled from your hard drive by
php and sent back as a part of the server response (your end web page).
~ Alex
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
>
> functio
I'm not sure as to why strpos does what it does here, at least its not
immediately obvious, but, a solution to this would be to use a regular
expression search, it would be more exact, it has never failed me, and it will
be faster; I recall reading that preg functions were faster at then str one
Imap remains open after you search and doesn't close until you call imap_close.
Firstly the code shouldn't be written like that, while should not operate on a
fail condition of a function exec, that's just bad coding practice and that's
what causes a loop here. If there are no messages in the em
, but two?. I mean I have been trying but I got an
error*
* Fatal error: Call to a member function ... on a non-object in ...
I think the problem is $this->getTable() returns non-object.
There is nothing wrong with using multiply "->" as long as return-value
from previous
Just a correction, dates in mysql are not strings by any means, they are stored
in 3 bytes (date and time or 8 bytes for datetime) and that's nowhere enough
for a string, however the representation of the date is a formatted string, so
for all intents and purposes any comparison to a date field
You shouldn't have a default value in an auto increment field. You can set
AUTO_INCREMENT to 0 and start with 1, but as auto increment is a unique field
and its automagically incremented, you should not set a default value on it...
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my br
The exec function should help you there
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
"ƒAƒ‹ƒxƒ‹ƒg" wrote:
hi! what I want to do is execute php script and don't wait for output. found
something like this_
> /dev/null 2>&1 &`;
That or do it in mysql before you get the data back, its also pretty good at
sorting, you know ;)
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
FeIn wrote:
Also check http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.natsort.php On Tue, Mar 1,
2011 at 1:39 PM, David Robley wrote
The same content is served, the page looks exactly the same, nobody had to
really change any code (there was a change in one of our framework modules
that one of the plug-ins calls, but it was small enough (5 lines)), minus
the wait... a lot of it :)
Hopefully this gives you ideas that work
connection to 127.0.0.1 would ever possibly get dropped, loopback device
never hits your network hardware...
~Alex
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Jostein Eriksen wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 10:49 PM, Adam Richardson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Jostein Eriksen
>>
other
hand it could be neither; but to help you figure out where to look, one
should hope to see a little bit more info...
~Alex
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Jostein Eriksen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been having some problems with memcache lately.
> It seems to me that php is dropp
sult)) { $internal_links[] =
array('phrase'=>$row->phrase,
'link'=>$row->link); }
(you can figure out how to do it with array_push if you choose to, but you
get the general idea)
~ Alex
On Jan 25, 2011 6:35 AM, "Merlin Morgenstern" wrote:
> Am 2
27;=>"http://wolframalpha.com";)), -1);
Output:
süße knuffige http://google.com";>Beagle http://wolframalpha.com";>Welpen ab
~Alex
to work around that, instantiate it with a query or result object from a
statement and you get a uniform way to get the result array...
http://pastebin.com/sAhZJcNX
~ Alex
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Jay Blanchard wrote:
> [snip]
> Just don't go too far.
> [/snip]
>
>
but that doesnt work if you add something after the "Mooo" *sigh*.
well it gets kept
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Alex Nikitin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm kind of new to this list, and so if there have been discussions about
> this, i am not quite aware of them
der for this to work
correctly, not sure about the elegantly part, but you can just limit
preg_replace
preg_replace('/(?:(?!"[a-zA-Z\s]*").)*/', '', $str, 1);
and that seems to work correctly...
Neat... kinda...
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Alex Nikitin wrote:
... Any ideas? bug, something i'm not
getting, something in the way preg works?
Thanks in advance,
~ Alex
the previous one
>
> is it possible to let the script focus another curl process without
> wait
> answer of the previous one
>
> i hope if u could understand me ^^
This question has been asked several times over the last week, have a look
over the archive ;).
You need to be lo
'm currently looking through Karl's example to see if I can work it out,
but if anyone can point out a super-simple way of achieving the pseudo-code
above, i'd be very grateful!
Cheers,
Alex
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 00:12 +010
The images that this outputs, at opacity levels 0,1 and 80 on a red and
green background (screenshots of a HTML page) can be downloaded from
http://www.box.net/shared/h9zn4tjgro
Any help appreciated!
Cheers,
Alex
ed some insight into which is the recommended
approach and why. I've been building bigger and bigger sites so having a
solid foundation is becoming more and more important.
Thanks for any help/feedback, I hope I've been clear.
Alex.
seems heavy, I know it has its supporters
but I've always found it to be overkill for the projects I've worked on.
Alex.
-Original Message-
From: Andre Polykanine [mailto:an...@oire.org]
Sent: 30 March 2010 14:14
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Still searching f
heridan.co.uk]
Sent: 15 March 2010 12:56
To: Midhun Girish
Cc: Jochem Maas; David Hutto; php-general@lists.php.net; Alex Major
Subject: Re: [PHP] Event Handling
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 18:28 +0530, Midhun Girish wrote:
> rene "a page with an ajax script that kicks off the
check-for-recen
inded.
I was hoping that someone might have some experience with this kind of issue
and could point me in the right direction. I'm sure I've missed something
right in front of me.
Alex.
I can't see any conceivable benefit to this restriction when using
open_basedir, as I thought that related to the local file system - unless CURL
can use file:// URLs to access the local system?
That's the problem.
I always use open_basedir (not all the sites on my servers are safe
enough). An
1 - 100 of 800 matches
Mail list logo
