Hello
On 8/24/18, H. Hirzel wrote:
> On 8/23/18, Jesús Marí wrote:
>> I'll take a look to *nteract*, seems that it uses the same protocol to
>> communicate with kernels.
>
> Good, actually my goal is to have a simple installation in a new Linux
> installation,
> something like
>
> a) download nt
it's done.
please try again
Thanks
--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
Last update works also on *nteract*
In the other hand, I could not understand how Jupyter knows about Pharo
kernel without the configuration file!!! Unbelievable!
--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
user25@Latitude2:~$ find . -name libzmq*
./anaconda3/lib/pkgconfig/libzmq.pc
./anaconda3/lib/libzmq.so.5
./anaconda3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/zmq/backend/cython/libzmq.pxd
./anaconda3/lib/libzmq.so
./anaconda3/lib/libzmq.so.5.1.5
./anaconda3/lib/libzmq.la
./anaconda3/lib/libzmq.a
./anaconda3/pkg
Hi Hannes,
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 at 06:36, H. Hirzel wrote:
>
> Hello Alistair
>
> Thank you for the detailed answer. I understand that at the moment
> going for a Pharo snap package does not seem to be useful.
>
> In particular as a Pharo installation may reside in a directory with
> everything in
Hello
Installing Roassal in 6.1 through the catalog gives the message that
it has not been tested for installation in 6.0. See screen shot.
Is this the regular way to go for or is there a better installation script?
Regards
Hannes
