The Pharo Consortium is very happy to announce that FINWorks
has joined the Consortium as a Bronze Member.
FINWorks: http://finworks.biz
FINWorks provides software solutions and automation in the financial
sector.
Our main area of focus is investment administration, especially
Hello,
This mail to announce you that I am working on a windows previewer /
switcher for
Pharo [1].
It is still in early stage of development but it is usable.
To install it:
|Metacello new repository:
'github://JulienDelplanque/WindowsPreviewer/repository'; baseline:
'WindowsPreviewer'; l
Hi,
is it possible to accept a method without creating instance variable?
E.g.
~~
Object subclass: #MyObject
slots: { }
classVariables: { }
category: 'Category'
~~
~~
MyObject>>addValue: aValue
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Peter Uhnak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to accept a method without creating instance variable?
>
> E.g.
>
> ~~
> Object subclass: #MyObject
> slots: { }
> classVariables: { }
> category: 'Category'
> ~~~
Yeah I guess that's not such a bad idea, to have a TemplateClass that would
contain just the template methods, so I don't need to worry about
conflicting instance variables.
Peter
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Ben Coman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Peter Uhnak wrote:
> > Hi,
>
Hi Tim,
> Le 27 juin 2016 à 22:12, Tim Mackinnon a écrit :
>
> Hi guys - I finally got some free time to take a look at Pharo-5 and wanted
> Launcher back as well - I just downloaded it on my mac and I’m wondering if
> something is wrong?
>
> The UI doesn’t look right (compared to the older 4
Still, I think it would be nice to be able to save a method even when it
does not compile.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Peter Uhnák wrote:
> Yeah I guess that's not such a bad idea, to have a TemplateClass that
> would contain just the template methods, so I don't need to worry about
> confl
On 28/06/2016 15:03, Nicolas Passerini wrote:
> Still, I think it would be nice to be able to save a method even when it
> does not compile.
>
I think Marcus added the possibility to do that in Pharo 6 as a Setting.
--
Cyril Ferlicot
http://www.synectique.eu
165 Avenue Bretagne
Lille 59000 Fr
Ding dong Marcus!
Le 28 juin 2016 15:04, "Nicolas Passerini" a écrit :
> Still, I think it would be nice to be able to save a method even when it
> does not compile.
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Peter Uhnák wrote:
>
>> Yeah I guess that's not such a bad idea, to have a TemplateClass that
Le 28/06/2016 15:03, Nicolas Passerini a écrit :
Still, I think it would be nice to be able to save a method even when it
does not compile.
I believe it would be better to be able to manipulate, inspect and edit
properly virtual methods (MCMethodDefinition, RB-created methods) given
that savi
> On 28 Jun 2016, at 15:09, Guillermo Polito wrote:
>
> Ding dong Marcus!
>
>
… is on Holidays… with the option #optionParseErrors you can compile code with
syntax errors:
method := Smalltalk compiler
class: UndefinedObject;
options: #(+ optionParseErrors);
compile:
Thanks Julien. Testing it. It looks pretty cool and seems really useful
for my clutter windows usage that Pharo / Smalltalk tends towards. See:
or full screen at:
https://offray.withknown.com/2016/windows-preview-on-pharo-by-julien-delplanque
Cheers,
Offray
On 28/06/16 07:51, Julien Delpla
Christophe Demarey writes:
> Pharo launcher is now shipped with both vm (pre-spur and spur). The
> cog-spur vm now powered PharoLauncher and should be used to run spur
> images. If not, maybe you have a wrong setting for it. If you remove
> settings for both VM it should work. Maybe I should remov
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
> On 28 Jun 2016, at 15:09, Guillermo Polito
> wrote:
>
> Ding dong Marcus!
>
>
> … is on Holidays… with the option #optionParseErrors you can compile code
> with syntax errors:
wow! quite an intelligent bot you are there. written in Small
Thierry,
I think I tried the obvious:
1. open existing repository with gitfiletree://
2. reload all packages from gitfiletree repo and remove old filetree://
repo from each package
3. edit .filetree and add `"Metadata" : "false"`
but when I save a package I continue to get metadata created .
Hi Dale,
Le 28/06/2016 20:49, Dale Henrichs a écrit :
Thierry,
I think I tried the obvious:
1. open existing repository with gitfiletree://
2. reload all packages from gitfiletree repo and remove old filetree://
repo from each package
3. edit .filetree and add `"Metadata" : "false"`
bu
Hi,
Did you try it with OSX? Does not seem to work for me with cmd + tab.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <
offray.l...@mutabit.com> wrote:
> Thanks Julien. Testing it. It looks pretty cool and seems really useful
> for my clutter windows usage that Pharo / Smallt
No, I tried on Gnu/Linux.
On 28/06/16 14:30, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Hi,
Did you try it with OSX? Does not seem to work for me with cmd + tab.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
mailto:offray.l...@mutabit.com>> wrote:
Thanks Julien. Testing it. It look
Thierry,
I don't think I can do it at all... I've deleted all of the packages,
I've removed all traces of the repository and when I add the repository
and inspect I get hasMetadata false...
I then deleted the metadata directory from every package on disk and
committed ... I then loaded the p
BTW, I loaded git file tree with the Catalog Browser, so I'm not
necessarily using the latest code from Github:
BaselineOfGitFileTree-ThierryGoubier.16
Dale
On 6/28/16 12:55 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote:
Thierry,
I don't think I can do it at all... I've deleted all of the packages,
I've remo
On 6/28/16 12:19 PM, Thierry Goubier wrote:
Hi Dale,
Le 28/06/2016 20:49, Dale Henrichs a écrit :
Also I'm hoping that in metadataless mode I stop scanning the entire
known repository universe for package versions that will not be found
anywhere but in the repositories that I've explicitly a
Dale,
I'm sure it is possible. Wait, wait! If you have in your .filetree
"Metadata" : "false" then this is fine and it has switched to the
metadata-less mode.
To see the changes on disk, you need to save a new version of your
packages, that should be all.
I just tried and that works.
1- r
Hi!
I have a simple use of NeoCSVReader, but I get a rollback.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
content := (ZnEasy get:
'https://github.com/sudar/pig-samples/raw/master/data/tweets.csv') contents
readStream.
lines := (NeoCSVReader on: content)
skipHeader;
upToEnd.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The url
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Alexandre,
I do not have access to a pharo image right now. But I had a look into
your csv file.
There are rows that do not include any or to few data. I think
NeoCSVReader can not handle that and expects a "proper" file
I will check tonight, in case nobody else comes
On 6/28/16 2:16 PM, Thierry Goubier wrote:
Dale,
I'm sure it is possible. Wait, wait! If you have in your .filetree
"Metadata" : "false" then this is fine and it has switched to the
metadata-less mode.
To see the changes on disk, you need to save a new version of your
packages, that shoul
Argh i was so thrilled by this ! But it doesn't seem to work on windows :/
Ctrl+tab gives the focus to the front window or makes an "inspect it" on
the current editor line...
Thank you anyway !
On 28/06/2016 14:51, Julien Delplanque wrote:
Also, here is a screenshot (I forgot to attach it to
On 6/28/16 2:16 PM, Thierry Goubier wrote:
Dale,
I'm sure it is possible. Wait, wait! If you have in your .filetree
"Metadata" : "false" then this is fine and it has switched to the
metadata-less mode.
To see the changes on disk, you need to save a new version of your
packages, that shoul
On 6/28/16 2:16 PM, Thierry Goubier wrote:
Dale,
I'm sure it is possible. Wait, wait! If you have in your .filetree
"Metadata" : "false" then this is fine and it has switched to the
metadata-less mode.
To see the changes on disk, you need to save a new version of your
packages, that shoul
Thierry,
Okay ... it is "working" now ... I was also misled by the fact that you
are continuing to fabricate Monticello version numbers which presumably
cannot be relied upon in any way.
Tugrik-Help-DaleHenrichs.11 will show up in each branch that includes
the commit for "Tugrik-Help-DaleHen
Hi Dale,
Le 29/06/2016 01:50, Dale Henrichs a écrit :
Thierry,
Okay ... it is "working" now ... I was also misled by the fact that you
are continuing to fabricate Monticello version numbers which presumably
cannot be relied upon in any way.
Tugrik-Help-DaleHenrichs.11 will show up in each bran
30 matches
Mail list logo