At least in unix creating files and folders are different operations
(mkdir/touch, rm/rmdir).
And even though it may seem convenient I would argue that it will create
unintentional issues — if you have incorrect folder it will silently create
errornous structure on the disk instead of throwing err
Yes but why ensureCreateFile then ?
Why don't we juste create a message createFile as there is createFolder ?
createFolder : create the folder
createFile : create the file
ensureCreateFolder : create the folder and its parents if necessary
ensureCreateFile : create the file and its parents if nece
2016-04-21 9:55 GMT+02:00 Valentin Ryckewaert :
> Yes but why ensureCreateFile then ?
> Why don't we juste create a message createFile as there is createFolder ?
> createFolder : create the folder
> createFile : create the file
>
> ensureCreateFolder : create the folder and its parents if necessar
because it's like this
ensureCreateFolder : create the folder structure if necessary
ensureCreateFile : create the file if necessary
I really don't see any gain from changing existing behavior and introducing
potential problems.
If I ask for file to be created, I don't expect that the system will
Hi Diego, the most updated version is published in GitHub.
https://github.com/tesonep/j2Inferer
In that place there is also some documentation.
Cheers,
Pablo
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Diego Orellana wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
>
> Well, I tried to load the packages from your repositories, but I
Hi Pablo,
We are diving into the mysteries of BaselineOf.
After having cloned the github repo and loaded manually the baseline. We tried:
BaselineOfJ2Inferer project version load
But we get a could not resolve: J2Inferer-Implementors.
No idea whether your Baseline is oddly defined or Metacello/B
How to open a IBBrowser by the way?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 10:06 AM, teso...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi Diego, the most updated version i
2016-04-21 3:43 GMT-03:00 p...@highoctane.be :
> In Windows, there are junctions, which are more or less equivalent.
>
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365006(v=vs.85).aspx
Yeap, I use it with this tool.
http://schinagl.priv.at/nt/hardlinkshellext/linkshellextension.ht
Pablo,
can you give us some usage examples? First I would like to get the type
inference data programmatically in order to compare the type data with
other tools. And also, I would like to open the IBBrowser. Here's what I've
tried so far:
For getting argument types:
(((J2Inferer default inferCl
fs := FileSystem memory.
fs workingDirectory "memory:///".
What is the conceptual meaning of #workingDirectory here?
Shouldn't it just throw an error for memory FileStore as it makes no sense?
I.e. I didn't launch any image from memory.
Peter
The editor used to inform when there was an unused local variable and
offered to remove it.
Is it possible to get this behavior back, or is it a feature regression
with the "new" (this changed some time ago) editor?
Thanks,
Peter
In a unix system, there is only one filesystem. Meaning: if you have
several disks or partitions, either they are mounted in The Unique
Filesystem, or they are not mounted and are just a blob of some gigabytes.
The working directory is a per-process property, not per-filesystem.
(except that window
This was changed somewhere in November by Marcus and Miguel, and it was
intentional, as part of the work on annotations on the AST that enabled
breakpoints. (Breakpoints use the same highlighting mechanism).
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 18:52, Peter Uhnák wrote:
>
> The editor used to inform when th
> On Apr 20, 2016, at 23:55, Alistair Grant wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:43:19PM +0200, Cyril Ferlicot D. wrote:
>> Le 20/04/2016 22:47, Alistair Grant a écrit :
>>> So, time to learn more about Monticello... Reading the Updated PbE is
>>> helpful, however I did notice one thing which
My point is that it is a proof that a library is not good when it forces
users to redefined core code.
Stef
Le 15/4/16 23:06, Peter Uhnák a écrit :
I did not really get it. Now I have the impression that changing
the method definition shows that Pharo does not
offer the correct p
Le 16/4/16 11:33, kmo a écrit :
/Pharo is yours, so you can add it. :)/
Yes, but I don't want to add it. I expect it to be there out of the box.
So you believe either is modern slavery or magic auto generation :D
Seriously if you that need it are not ready to invest 30 min why me that
does
Le 16/4/16 12:18, kmo a écrit :
Well, my reply was rather tongue-in-cheek. I was mocking my own laziness and
the laziness of developers like me. But really I have no problem in doing
these things for myself. And I hope that soon I will be in a position to
contribute to pharo myself.
But you a
17 matches
Mail list logo
