Re: [Pharo-users] Programmatically changing settings values

2015-01-10 Thread Ben Coman
Or to teach you how to fish rather than just feeding you :) Right click on the option and select "Display export action string". Actually, that has some StartupAction scaffolding probably not relevant is such cases, and it would be good to have an option for that. I'd like to change it from Rig

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] OS Project with initial support for Ubuntu and Unix

2015-01-10 Thread stepharo
this is cool What I would love is to have the possibility as in Ruby to invoke shell and the rest from Pharo! Stef Le 9/1/15 11:27, Torsten Bergmann a écrit : Hi, beside the existing "OS-Windows" support for Windows operating system the "Pharo OS project" (http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~OS) now

Re: [Pharo-users] Extending GTSpotter

2015-01-10 Thread Tudor Girba
It is not duplicated. The logic is different: - GTSpotterCandidatesProcessor>>is:matching: works as a filter on a given collection. - GTSpotter>>spotterImplementorsFor: is an iterator that tries to match as it runs. Anyway, this part of Spotter will be reworked soon. Doru On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at

[Pharo-users] Problem due to deprecation of class Url in Pharo 3 and Moose 5.0

2015-01-10 Thread PBKResearch
Hello I have run into a problem in moving some existing work from earlier versions of Pharo/Moose. I have found a work around, but I wonder if there is a tidier way of handling it. I make frequent use of Todd Blanchard's HTML parser and validator, HTMCSS (http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~ToddBla

Re: [Pharo-users] issue with and/or inlining

2015-01-10 Thread Evan Donahue
Hmm, so that works when I annotate my test class, but I probably shouldn't be exporting pragma concerns to my end users. Was your other suggestion about dealing with the warning itself something I could do, or were you referring to a change to pharo itself? In case it's relevant, the warning also s

Re: [Pharo-users] Problem due to deprecation of class Url in Pharo 3 and Moose 5.0

2015-01-10 Thread stepharo
Le 10/1/15 11:41, PBKResearch a écrit : Hello I have run into a problem in moving some existing work from earlier versions of Pharo/Moose. I have found a work around, but I wonder if there is a tidier way of handling it. I make frequent use of Todd Blanchard’s HTML parser and validator, H

Re: [Pharo-users] Metacello does not load the expected version from ConfigOf

2015-01-10 Thread Dale Henrichs
Usman, Thanks for supplying the image ... with that I could diagnose the problem. In the final analysis, the onDowngrade: feature just does not work[1]. I haven't had a `downgrade` use case in my own work flow, so I did not notice that it wasn't working and the test cases that I do have are o

Re: [Pharo-users] Problem due to deprecation of class Url in Pharo 3 and Moose 5.0

2015-01-10 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
> On 10 Jan 2015, at 16:45, stepharo wrote: > > > Le 10/1/15 11:41, PBKResearch a écrit : >> Hello >> >> I have run into a problem in moving some existing work from earlier versions >> of Pharo/Moose. I have found a work around, but I wonder if there is a >> tidier way of handling it. >>

[Pharo-users] How to subclass Float class

2015-01-10 Thread Hilaire
It looks like when I want to create a subclass of Float, I have this odd class creation message. Moreoever, I can add instance variable to this new class: when compiling there are wipe out: argument instanceVariableNames: '' remain empty. If I change Float to Object, all get back to normal. Why i

Re: [Pharo-users] Problem due to deprecation of class Url in Pharo 3 and Moose 5.0

2015-01-10 Thread PBKResearch
Sven: Thanks for the suggestions. I have tried ZnUrl>>#inContextOf:, but it does not produce the correct address; evidently I shall have to wait until you have full path merging implemented. Meanwhile, I have used your 'temporary hack' to ignore the deprecation; it is at least not as hackish as my

Re: [Pharo-users] Problem due to deprecation of class Url in Pharo 3 and Moose 5.0

2015-01-10 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
Peter, > On 10 Jan 2015, at 23:30, PBKResearch wrote: > >> Yes change the code of the Parser not to use old code. > As I pointed out, the Parser is a large and complex package, and I am not > the author, so this is easier said than done. It seems a bit odd to dismiss > code which worked OK in Mo