Re: [Pharo-users] Pillar annotations for Latex

2014-05-24 Thread stepharo
thanks for your help improving pillar because we are busy. Stef On 22/5/14 18:09, Ben Coman wrote: The Pillar documentation [1] says... "An annotated paragraph starts a line with @@ followed by either todo or note. For example, @@note this is a note annotation. generates

Re: [Pharo-users] [smallwiki] Pillar annotations for Latex

2014-05-24 Thread stepharo
Really nice! @@note Pay attention to the class definition for your new ""==BlankCellTest=="". It must be a subclass of the class ""==TestCase=="". This is easy to overlook. If you did it wrong already, no problem, just go back and correct it now and then save the code again. Within a clas

Re: [Pharo-users] [smallwiki] Pillar annotations for Latex

2014-05-24 Thread Damien Cassou
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Ben Coman wrote: >'dothis' = anAnnotatedParagraph annotation asLowercase > ifTrue: > [ canvas newLine. " > ^ canvas command > name: 'dothis' ; > parameter: [ super visitA

Re: [Pharo-users] deep into pharo(esug 2013) translate to korean draft version.

2014-05-24 Thread Damien Cassou
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 5:42 PM, peter yoo wrote: > hm really? can then i want. but really ok? sorry, I don't understand. I propose to add an url to your document on our website. If you are interested, no problem. Even if your translation is work in progress. -- Damien Cassou http://damien

Re: [Pharo-users] deep into pharo(esug 2013) translate to korean draft version.

2014-05-24 Thread peter yoo
I'm going to publish korean translation of Deep Into Pharo on my blog. Translation progress is all done and now I'm checking the translated document before I publish. It would be honor to me if you would like to put a URL link to my korean translation of Deep Into Pharo on your website. The URL o

[Pharo-users] MNU PREyeInspector>>elements for PRDocument with EyeTreeInspector

2014-05-24 Thread Ben Coman
I was looking at PRAnnotatedParagraphTest>>testParseBasic and Inspected the result of the following... | wiki text tree | wiki := '@@foo bar zork'. text := 'bar zork'. tree := PRDocument new add: (PRAnnotatedParagraph new annotation: 'foo'; add: (PR

Re: [Pharo-users] Downloading tweets

2014-05-24 Thread Arturo Zambrano
Hi, I copied the relevant part of the pdf to project info in SmalltalkHub http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~arturozambrano/TwitterRoassalPlayGround On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Arturo Zambrano wrote: > Hi Steph, > it is in pdf.. that's why we need more practical documentation ;-) > > Gof

Re: [Pharo-users] Class definition changes in change log

2014-05-24 Thread Arturo Zambrano
thanks Stef, using it now. On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:35 AM, stepharo wrote: > Hi Arturo > > May be you spot a bug, sadly. I remember that we got a problem in the past > and I thought it was fixed. > You can use Epicea the new and working change recording system developed > by Martin Dias. > >

Re: [Pharo-users] Class definition changes in change log

2014-05-24 Thread Arturo Zambrano
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > Also, I've wondered why it's not an error to attempt to apply a change that > creates a method on a non-existent class... > > +1 when installing code with Gofer/Monticello to non- existent class an exception is raised. seems to be rea

Re: [Pharo-users] Versionner: Specifying un-configured packages as dependencies

2014-05-24 Thread Arturo Zambrano
I think I'm now at the same point... I need to add Zinc-SSO as a dependency. Should I create a configuration for it? Where should it be stored? thanks On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:55 PM, stepharo wrote: > + 100 > > The reason is that any package* should be self described. Your > configuration

Re: [Pharo-users] Versionner: Specifying un-configured packages as dependencies

2014-05-24 Thread Arturo Zambrano
Sorry, SSO is a Group in ConfigurationOfZincHTTPComponent. I got confused as I didn't know about groups. Please ignore my previous email, I just need to make my project depend on Zinc SSO group On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Arturo Zambrano wrote: > I think I'm now at the same point...