[Pharo-users] [Pharo Consortium] New Sponsor: Object Profile

2014-02-25 Thread Marcus Denker
The Pharo Consortium is very happy to announce that Object Profile is supporting the Pharo Consortium as a Sponsor. More about - Object Profile: http://objectprofile.com - Pharo Consortium: http://consortium.pharo.org The goal of the Pharo Consortium is to allow companies to sup

Re: [Pharo-users] The new versionner is cool

2014-02-25 Thread Usman Bhatti
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Hernán Morales Durand < hernan.mora...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2014-02-21 8:25 GMT-03:00 Usman Bhatti : > > Hello, >> >> I found Versionner very productive tool. I was able to create a new >> configuration "from scratch" within a few minutes with the packages that

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] [Pharo Consortium] New Sponsor: Object Profile

2014-02-25 Thread Tudor Girba
Great!! Doru On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Marcus Denker wrote: > The Pharo Consortium is very happy to announce that Object Profile is > supporting the Pharo Consortium > as a Sponsor. > > More about > - Object Profile: http://objectprofile.com > - Pharo Consortium: http://

Re: [Pharo-users] Moose: Problem in Petit Parser

2014-02-25 Thread Damien Cassou
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 6:01 PM, PBK Research wrote: > but I shall take good care to read everything I can find before > raising queries. asking question is not a problem, please continue, even if you believe the answer is somewhere already. Don't hesitate to use stackoverflow (tag #pharo) for y

Re: [Pharo-users] Which one should I download?

2014-02-25 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
none just download this one: http://files.pharo.org/image/30/latest.zip is always the latest effective build. Esteban On 25 Feb 2014, at 21:05, François Stephany wrote: > I'd like to download the latest Pharo 3 on the CI server but I don't know > which one I should download? > > The last

Re: [Pharo-users] Which one should I download?

2014-02-25 Thread Robert Shiplett
I am running from that latest.zip tonight and PackageTreeNautilusUI >>update is getting a walkback messageNoUnderstood for receiver of >>protocolsFor: is nil I simply flipped to class view in Announcements and then flipped that toggle back. Does this need to be reported, or is Nautilus still know

Re: [Pharo-users] Which one should I download?

2014-02-25 Thread Robert Shiplett
that problematic latest.zip contains -30782 files R On 25 February 2014 19:02, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > none > > just download this one: > > http://files.pharo.org/image/30/latest.zip > > is always the latest effective build. > > Esteban > > On 25 Feb 2014, at 21:05, François Stephany > wro

Re: [Pharo-users] New methods for the String class

2014-02-25 Thread Hernán Morales Durand
Hi Daniela, 2014-02-24 14:30 GMT-03:00 Daniela Meneses : > Hi to all, > > As you may know I'm working on in some improvements for the String class. > Until now I implemented some missing tests. Right now I'm looking forward > to add new methods that could be useful based on Ruby API ( > http://ww

Re: [Pharo-users] Which one should I download?

2014-02-25 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
Nautilus is not unstable. That should not be happening and in fact I cannot reproduce it. Please report. On 26 Feb 2014, at 01:57, Robert Shiplett wrote: > I am running from that latest.zip tonight and PackageTreeNautilusUI >>update > is getting a walkback messageNoUnderstood for > receiver

Re: [Pharo-users] Which one should I download?

2014-02-25 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
and even if it would be unstable… issues needs to be always reported, is the only way to be aware :) On 26 Feb 2014, at 07:45, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > Nautilus is not unstable. > That should not be happening and in fact I cannot reproduce it. > Please report. > > On 26 Feb 2014, at 01:57