yeah for some reason math and physics men love static approach and awful
variable names. And fulfill their mouths talking about performance, just to
implement everything over tcp/ip even for camera and laser streaming.
sorry, i unleashed a bit the monster :)
2014-08-16 2:22 GMT+02:00 Luc Fabress
2014-08-15 19:16 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba :
> Indeed, this direction is really exciting.
>
> When I was at NDC, there were a couple of guys there that wanted to
> control their robot and they saw Pharo as a perfect match. With a more
> elaborate kit, we could have a door opener.
>
yes sure, this is
That sounds cool, I am interested in having LRP working with more robot
middlewares / APIs. Can you pass me their details? (privately)
On Aug 15, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Indeed, this direction is really exciting.
>
> When I was at NDC, there were a couple of guys there that wan
Indeed, this direction is really exciting.
When I was at NDC, there were a couple of guys there that wanted to control
their robot and they saw Pharo as a perfect match. With a more elaborate
kit, we could have a door opener.
Cheers,
Doru
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Johan Fabry wrote:
>
