Re: [Pharo-users] UFFI documentation state

2016-09-07 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
Yeap I agree, I have taken a look into documentation in the past when we discussed how similar is UFFI to Nativeboost, my only concern is whether things are about to change and what I learn becomes invalidated after a while which can be quite annoying . When I was playing with Nativeboost and NBOpe

Re: [Pharo-users] UFFI documentation state

2016-09-07 Thread Ben Coman
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > Hi Kilon, > > documentation is “ongoing”, but I think the only way I will actually finish > it is by answering questions from people (I’ve been pasting there the > answers I give also in the list). So I would ask you to take a look into th

Re: [Pharo-users] UFFI documentation state

2016-09-07 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
perfect I will take look and ask all the questions I need answered and I can also document my answers since I am familiar with Pillar as a UPBE contributor. Thanks :) On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:13 PM Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > Hi Kilon, > > documentation is “ongoing”, but I think the only way I wi

Re: [Pharo-users] UFFI documentation state

2016-09-07 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
Hi Kilon, documentation is “ongoing”, but I think the only way I will actually finish it is by answering questions from people (I’ve been pasting there the answers I give also in the list). So I would ask you to take a look into the doc and make all the questions that you want… so I answer, and

[Pharo-users] UFFI documentation state

2016-09-07 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
Hey Esteban hows the documentation for UFFI going ? I will most likely go down the Memory Mapped File (Shared Memory) for uniting Pharo with Unreal instead of making a Pharo to C++ compiler since it will be much simpler for me but I will need the FFI. Is it stable enough both FFI and its documentat