Well seen!! Good point!
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Jul 15, 2014, at 9:46 PM, Juraj Kubelka wrote:
> Just an idea: the svg path shape would not solve your needs? May
Just an idea: the svg path shape would not solve your needs? Maybe improving
trachel svg path and then use it for any desired shape, e.g., rectangles with
round corner? Does it have sense?
Cheers,
Jura
--
Juraj Kubelka
> El 15/07/2014, a las 03:24, Peter Uhnák escribió:
>
> Well in the long
Thanks Ben for your nice words
Alexandre
> On 15 Jul 2014, at 08:09, Ben Coman wrote:
>
> Peter Uhnák wrote:
>>
>> Well in the long run I will probably need much more shapes that are
>> currently present so I will probably end up making both TRShape and RTShape
>> anyway. As far as contribut
Defining new shapes is not complicated at all, and we will review your code.
The first thing is to define a trshape, you just have to override how you
compute the path, and checking for point inclusion (I.e., is a point inside the
shape or not). But beside that, this is all trivial.
Let us know
Peter Uhnák wrote:
Well in the long run I will probably need much more
shapes that are currently present so I will probably end up making both
TRShape and RTShape anyway. As far as contribution goes, I'd be happy
to contribute but I'm still quite new to both Pharo and Smalltalk so
I'm quite
Well in the long run I will probably need much more shapes that are
currently present so I will probably end up making both TRShape and RTShape
anyway. As far as contribution goes, I'd be happy to contribute but I'm
still quite new to both Pharo and Smalltalk so I'm quite skeptical about
the code q
Indeed, Roassal does not have a rectangle with rounded corner. Having it in
Roassal means you need a new TRShape and a new RTShape.
I could easily do the RTShape. But we need the TRShape first. Do you feel like
doing it? This will be a valuable addition to Roassal.
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^
Thank you, the example now works. However as I've mentioned in
previous post I'm not sure about the rest of the shapes posted in the
attachment. E.g. I haven't seen any notion of "box with rounded
corners". I could compose it from four RTArc nad four RTLine but it
seems to me overly complex compare
Sorry, the version was not properly saved in SmalltalkHub. If you update
Roassal2 and Trachel, you should be able to execute the code snippet I’ve sent
you. Maybe you want to add “v open” at the end. If you are using GTInspector,
this is not necessary.
As far as I understand your description of
Thank you both for suggestions.
According to Monticello I have latest Roassal2 and yet I don't see
RTMultiCompositeShape, but I would assume it should be what I was looking
for originally.
In the meantime I chose to do it manually - creating a custom shape in both
Roassal and Trachert:
I've done
Hi Peter,
I am not sure what you try to do. Having two ellipses with the same center? But
different radius?
Something like that maybe:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| v |
v := RTView new.
v @ RTDraggableView.
shape := RTMultiCompositeShape new.
shape add: (RTEllipse new color: (Color yellow alpha: 0.3);
I think you should make a new composite shape. But first check how the width
and height is computed, because the shapes somehow share the same (biggest)
size.
Cheers,
Jura
--
Juraj Kubelka
> El 11/07/2014, a las 17:05, Peter Uhnák escribió:
>
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to draw an ellipse inside an
Hi
I'm trying to draw an ellipse inside another ellipse but to no avail. I've
tried using RTCompositeShape but that just expands the size of the smaller
shape. Is there something else I'm missing (like fixing dimensions so they
won't get updated) or should I subclass RTAbstractCompositeShape and t
13 matches
Mail list logo
