Well seen!! Good point! Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Jul 15, 2014, at 9:46 PM, Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kube...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just an idea: the svg path shape would not solve your needs? Maybe improving > trachel svg path and then use it for any desired shape, e.g., rectangles with > round corner? Does it have sense? > > Cheers, > Jura > > -- > Juraj Kubelka > > El 15/07/2014, a las 03:24, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> escribió: > >> Well in the long run I will probably need much more shapes that are >> currently present so I will probably end up making both TRShape and RTShape >> anyway. As far as contribution goes, I'd be happy to contribute but I'm >> still quite new to both Pharo and Smalltalk so I'm quite skeptical about the >> code quality. >> >> I've actually already made both shapes for rounded box but it will need some >> testing first; so I'll keep you posted. >> >> Peter >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.ber...@me.com> >> wrote: >> Indeed, Roassal does not have a rectangle with rounded corner. Having it in >> Roassal means you need a new TRShape and a new RTShape. >> >> I could easily do the RTShape. But we need the TRShape first. Do you feel >> like doing it? This will be a valuable addition to Roassal. >> >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> On Jul 13, 2014, at 9:57 AM, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Thank you, the example now works. However as I've mentioned in >>> previous post I'm not sure about the rest of the shapes posted in the >>> attachment. E.g. I haven't seen any notion of "box with rounded >>> corners". I could compose it from four RTArc nad four RTLine but it >>> seems to me overly complex compared to creating new Trachert/Roassal >>> classes. The same would go for the other shapes. What are your >>> thoughts/recommendations on that? >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Alexandre Bergel >>> <alexandre.ber...@me.com> wrote: >>>> Sorry, the version was not properly saved in SmalltalkHub. If you update >>>> Roassal2 and Trachel, you should be able to execute the code snippet I’ve >>>> sent you. Maybe you want to add “v open” at the end. If you are using >>>> GTInspector, this is not necessary. >>>> >>>> As far as I understand your description of the problem, you do not need to >>>> create your own shape. >>>> >>>> Let me know how it goes. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jul 13, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thank you both for suggestions. >>>>> >>>>> According to Monticello I have latest Roassal2 and yet I don't see >>>>> RTMultiCompositeShape, but I would assume it should be what I was looking >>>>> for originally. >>>>> >>>>> In the meantime I chose to do it manually - creating a custom shape in >>>>> both Roassal and Trachert: >>>>> I've done it in a single path because it seems that having multiple >>>>> separate paths just creates more trouble. >>>>> ======== >>>>> computePath >>>>> canvas ifNil: [ ^ self ]. >>>>> path := self athensCanvas >>>>> createPath: [ :builder | >>>>> builder absolute. >>>>> self ccwCirclePath: builder radius: 0.5. "building >>>>> circular path with specified radius" >>>>> self cwCirclePath: builder radius: 0.48. >>>>> self ccwCirclePath: builder radius: 0.4 ] >>>>> ======== >>>>> >>>>> But even if I could manage to do this with MultiCompositeShape I'm not >>>>> sure about the rest of the shapes (see attachment). >>>>> >>>>> Peter >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Alexandre Bergel >>>>> <alexandre.ber...@me.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi Peter, >>>>> >>>>> I am not sure what you try to do. Having two ellipses with the same >>>>> center? But different radius? >>>>> >>>>> Something like that maybe: >>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >>>>> | v | >>>>> v := RTView new. >>>>> v @ RTDraggableView. >>>>> >>>>> shape := RTMultiCompositeShape new. >>>>> shape add: (RTEllipse new color: (Color yellow alpha: 0.3); size: [:c | c >>>>> numberOfMethods sqrt * 10 ]). >>>>> shape add: (RTEllipse new color: (Color green alpha: 0.3); size: [:c | c >>>>> numberOfLinesOfCode sqrt * 10 ]). >>>>> >>>>> v addAll: (shape elementsOn: RTShape withAllSubclasses). >>>>> RTFlowLayout on: v elements. >>>>> >>>>> v >>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >>>>> >>>>> <Screen Shot 2014-07-13 at 1.18.36 AM.png> >>>>> >>>>> Alexandre >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jul 11, 2014, at 11:05 PM, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm trying to draw an ellipse inside another ellipse but to no avail. >>>>>> I've tried using RTCompositeShape but that just expands the size of the >>>>>> smaller shape. Is there something else I'm missing (like fixing >>>>>> dimensions so they won't get updated) or should I subclass >>>>>> RTAbstractCompositeShape and try to make something on my own? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Peter >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <shapes.png> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >>
