Re: [Pharo-users] Pratsch

2014-10-28 Thread Alain Busser
To understand better the Pharo "philosophy", I would advocate Pharo by example, which helped me a lot to understand how I can display objects in the transcript with Transcript show: (8*7) or to know more of the object with (8*7) inspect (actually I know this not from the book because Hilaire to

Re: [Pharo-users] Pratsch

2014-10-28 Thread Thierry Goubier
Hi Hans, I would not hesitate to state that in the Smalltalk vision, we should make no difference between a user and a programmer: a user has the right to be a programmer. Today, in academic circles, we call that "end-user programming" if you need more references (:)). If you take some of

Re: [Pharo-users] Pratsch

2014-10-28 Thread S Krish
Unlike in C/ C++ world where packaging creates an exe, Smalltalk has no packaged content for its program. Similar to Smalltalk is Java that packages its code / compiled bytecode as a jar . This jar can be "executable" but per se what it does is to start a JVM with loading of all the necessary depe

Re: [Pharo-users] Pratsch

2014-10-28 Thread kilon alios
no pain , no gain On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Hans Schueren wrote: > Thank you Thierry , > > > guess i am an user. > > > " I have heared there are Pharo programmers" > > > Can i download such a program to see how good they are ? > > > I dont want to hear anything about coding and IDE and de

[Pharo-users] Pratsch

2014-10-28 Thread Hans Schueren
Thank you Thierry , guess i am an user. " I have heared there are Pharo programmers" Can i download such a program to see how good they are ? I dont want to hear anything about coding and IDE and development. I am a user and want to start a example program. Do you have a LINK for me t