Thank you for the answers!
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Dimitris Chloupis
wrote:
> It does not matter. When it comes to performance the workflow is always
> the same whatever the language you use.
>
> 1. Profile the code see where it consume most CPU cycles
> 2. Can you improve the code to re
It does not matter. When it comes to performance the workflow is always the
same whatever the language you use.
1. Profile the code see where it consume most CPU cycles
2. Can you improve the code to remove unnecessary processing ? You will be
surprised how many times its your code and not the lan
What ruby runtime exactly ? The standard ruby interpreter, rubinius, JRuby ?
What do you mean by performance ? Smallest time to run long computation ?
Latency for web servers ? Pauses in real time applications ?
The standard ruby interpreter is really slow (likely ~100 times slower than
the Pharo
Hello,
How is Pharo compared with Ruby in terms of performance? Has someone done
some comparison benchmark? If yes, that was done with other platforms?
Regards,
VItor