[Pharo-users] New Pharo Collections: Question about MultiDictionary

2015-03-01 Thread AlexanderBrenchev via Pharo-users
--- Begin Message --- Greetings to everyone. Recently i started my pre-bachelor's work called "New Collections for Pharo". ( introduction to my project ) I decided to start with the MultiDictionary. There is a very basic prototype availa

Re: [Pharo-users] New Pharo Collections

2014-12-18 Thread stepharo
In the Design Pattern iterator there are some nice examples about iterators. Stef Le 17/12/14 08:49, Clément Bera a écrit : 2014-12-17 7:42 GMT+01:00 Damien Cassou >: Le 16 déc. 2014 22:48, "dboeren" mailto:boer...@gmail.com>> a écrit :. > Off the top

Re: [Pharo-users] New Pharo Collections

2014-12-17 Thread Stephan Eggermont
>The goal of my project is to make a new collections for Pharo Smalltalk. >We have a great plans about list of important collections, but we also need >your opinion about them. >So, feel free to make your suggestions about collections which you want to be >implemented. The most important chan

Re: [Pharo-users] New Pharo Collections

2014-12-16 Thread Clément Bera
2014-12-17 7:42 GMT+01:00 Damien Cassou : > > > Le 16 déc. 2014 22:48, "dboeren" a écrit :. > > Off the top of my head, I would be interested in support for "slices" > > meaning taking being able to treat a subset of a larger > OrderedCollection as > > its own OrderedCollection rather than using c

Re: [Pharo-users] New Pharo Collections

2014-12-16 Thread Damien Cassou
Le 16 déc. 2014 22:48, "dboeren" a écrit :. > Off the top of my head, I would be interested in support for "slices" > meaning taking being able to treat a subset of a larger OrderedCollection as > its own OrderedCollection rather than using copyFrom:to: to create a > duplicate object to work with.

Re: [Pharo-users] New Pharo Collections

2014-12-16 Thread dboeren
Sounds like a great idea for a project. Off the top of my head, I would be interested in support for "slices" meaning taking being able to treat a subset of a larger OrderedCollection as its own OrderedCollection rather than using copyFrom:to: to create a duplicate object to work with. It seems t