Re: [Pharo-users] FileBrowser confusion

> > Ok. Could you please open a bug report on that for the inspector? Since as Nicolai pointed out there is this "14250 Enable large file support on linux", there is probably no point in creating an extra one. I built custom VM with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=

Re: [Pharo-users] FileBrowser confusion

2014-11-06 23:25 GMT+01:00 Tudor Girba : > Hi, > > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Peter Uhnák wrote: > >> > It is indeed known that Pharo cannot open files larger than 4GB (even >> that after you setup the VM specifically). >> It seems like Pharo bug >> >> 1. FileReference>>gtInspectorItemsIn

Re: [Pharo-users] FileBrowser confusion

Hi, On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Peter Uhnák wrote: > > It is indeed known that Pharo cannot open files larger than 4GB (even > that after you setup the VM specifically). > It seems like Pharo bug > > 1. FileReference>>gtInspectorItemsIn: composite > ... > column: 'Size' evaluated: [:each |

Re: [Pharo-users] FileBrowser confusion

The large file seems to return false on most things (also creationTime)... so this would need some tinkering. Also I am confused as to why this happens. Failing actual opening of the file would be understandable but these (size, creationTime) are just some inode data, but I could be (and probably a

Re: [Pharo-users] FileBrowser confusion

> What do you mean by a lot? another problem I had was with privileges ... it shows folder of a root but when I click it it throws DirectoryDoesNotExist and not PermissionDenied (or something); but this is negligible issue - i clicked on the folder randomly to try the Inspector. Also as mentioned

Re: [Pharo-users] FileBrowser confusion

> It is indeed known that Pharo cannot open files larger than 4GB (even that after you setup the VM specifically). It seems like Pharo bug 1. FileReference>>gtInspectorItemsIn: composite ... column: 'Size' evaluated: [:each | each humanReadableSize] width: 100; ... 2. FileReference>>humanReadable

Re: [Pharo-users] FileBrowser confusion

Hi, On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Peter Uhnák wrote: > I checked out the file browser GT Inspector (I hope that is what you were > referring to), unfortunately it's crashing a lot for me (it seems it can't > figure out file size for large files (~4GB) and some other stuff > (sockets?)). > Wh

Re: [Pharo-users] FileBrowser confusion

I checked out the file browser GT Inspector (I hope that is what you were referring to), unfortunately it's crashing a lot for me (it seems it can't figure out file size for large files (~4GB) and some other stuff (sockets?)). However I don't know if Glamour is planning to turn it into full file br

Re: [Pharo-users] FileBrowser confusion

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Peter Uhnák wrote: > Is anyone actually using FileBrowser? Because either no one does or I > doing something wrong. > > My problem is that it is very uncomfortable to navigate filesystem. There > is no way to quickly navigate to common folders (like roots of system

Re: [Pharo-users] FileBrowser confusion

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > The real question is if we invest in the current FileList code or better in > one based on the filesystem explore code in GT? I think that would make sense -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the ability to

Re: [Pharo-users] FileBrowser confusion

> On 06 Nov 2014, at 15:55, Peter Uhnák wrote: > > Is anyone actually using FileBrowser? Because either no one does or I doing > something wrong. > I do not think it is used a lot... > My problem is that it is very uncomfortable to navigate filesystem. There is > no way to quickly navigate t

[Pharo-users] FileBrowser confusion

Is anyone actually using FileBrowser? Because either no one does or I doing something wrong. My problem is that it is very uncomfortable to navigate filesystem. There is no way to quickly navigate to common folders (like roots of system drives and home directory). Also hidden files/folders are sho