On 28/04/15 12:35, Joachim Tuchel wrote:
isn't that a weak argument?
Yes, it is. And taking a look at the actual
categories gives me the impression that
naming is done better than categorization.
Stephan
Stephan,
isn't that a weak argument? If I change the bhavior of a method and forget to
rename it to something intention revealing, there also is no guarantuee that the
name tells a developer anything about it...
Joachim
> Stephan Eggermont hat am 28. April 2015 um 12:17
> geschrieben:
>
>
> On
On 28/04/15 01:44, Sergio Fedi wrote:
I already do that.
(and I also make sure my tests have 100% coverage over the Public protocol)
But to know that you have to memorize the methods that are in the test
cases.
Besides, I may want to test private methods too.
The categorization of methods is a
I already do that.
(and I also make sure my tests have 100% coverage over the Public protocol)
But to know that you have to memorize the methods that are in the test
cases.
Besides, I may want to test private methods too.
On 28/04/15 00:53, Sergio Fedi wrote:
How can I deal with this problem? Which is "the Pharo way" to accomplish
this?
Uhm, you write unit tests for the public API? Showing what you expect to
sent to an object in a nice descriptive way?
Stephan
The only other way I can think of doing this is via the virtual categories
(which Pharo seems to have) and make them look for "Public" at the
beggining of the first comment.
Not fancy, but practical.
Sergio, a few times I also wanted that. And the only way of doing it I
found was by doing defining protocols like 'public' , 'public -
subcategoryX', 'public - subcategoryY' , etc... not sure powerful but
simple.
Cheers,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Sergio Fedi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In other sma
Hi,
In other smalltalks, which had the capability of marking a method with more
than one category, I could make a method public/private AND it's functional
category (accessor, printing, etc)
I did this to explicitly show the user which methods I expect to be sent to
the object and which ones I do
