Re: [Pharo-users] Class definition changes in change log

2014-05-24 Thread Arturo Zambrano
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > Also, I've wondered why it's not an error to attempt to apply a change that > creates a method on a non-existent class... > > +1 when installing code with Gofer/Monticello to non- existent class an exception is raised. seems to be rea

Re: [Pharo-users] Class definition changes in change log

2014-05-24 Thread Arturo Zambrano
thanks Stef, using it now. On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:35 AM, stepharo wrote: > Hi Arturo > > May be you spot a bug, sadly. I remember that we got a problem in the past > and I thought it was fixed. > You can use Epicea the new and working change recording system developed > by Martin Dias. > >

Re: [Pharo-users] Class definition changes in change log

2014-05-19 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
Arturo Zambrano wrote > When trying to recover the changes, class name changes are not there Yes, I've been bitten by this as well. It becomes a major PITA to manually search through the changes and find the places to manually define classes. Also, I've wondered why it's not an error to attempt to

Re: [Pharo-users] Class definition changes in change log

2014-05-18 Thread stepharo
Hi Arturo May be you spot a bug, sadly. I remember that we got a problem in the past and I thought it was fixed. You can use Epicea the new and working change recording system developed by Martin Dias. Stef On 18/5/14 14:58, Arturo Zambrano wrote: Hi All, Trying to recover lost changes f

[Pharo-users] Class definition changes in change log

2014-05-18 Thread Arturo Zambrano
Hi All, Trying to recover lost changes from another (broken) image I noticed that only method definition and do-it are saved. I'm in a middle of a refactoring where I changed hierarchies, renamed classes and inst vars. When trying to recover the changes, class name changes are not there, so