@all, Is there some way to disable garbage collection during such
benchmarks?
cheers -ben
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 3:51 AM, Steven Costiou
wrote:
> I spent my day testing and comparing execution speed between classes and
> anonymous subclasses when i tried to compare two sets of values between
I spent my day testing and comparing execution speed between classes and
anonymous subclasses when i tried to compare two sets of values between
pharo classes: they also differ.
In fact it seems that every instruction has a different execution speed
if we run it enough times. So it seems impossib
You can find the code below. I just change the call to m by m1 to test
the two methods.
I started again in a fresh pharo 6 image and now the results seem all
similar for the following code. I will do all my tests again to see if
it was my fault but it takes a lot of time (2 hours for each full te
Hi Steven.
Could you show code which you measure?
2017-06-16 17:17 GMT+02:00 Steven Costiou :
> I have been playing a bit with anonymous subclasses, and instances of anon
> subclasses seem slower to execute code than "regular" subclasses instances,
> but sometimes they reach equivalent performan
I have been playing a bit with anonymous subclasses, and instances of
anon subclasses seem slower to execute code than "regular" subclasses
instances, but sometimes they reach equivalent performances (for code
defined in anon-subclasses). I don't understand why.
I have a class A with a method m.
