I'm happy to help with GUI design stuff. (I'm formally trained in HCI and in
UI methods, e.g. STUDIO) Simply email me.
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/IMPORTANT-Starting-migration-to-Spur-VM-tp4866921p4869102.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive
I think the market for cross-platform apps is large - but the market
for apps that you can't sell is small. Being able to sell the
cross-platform apps via the iOS and Android app stores is key, imo.
As it is, I target Nintendo 2DS & 3DS, and Blackberry tablet and all
Windows as well as iPads, iPh
Todd, have you investigated using Squeak/Pharo at the back-end and
Amber at the front end?
That's where I'm currently targetting my development work.
On 14 December 2015 at 01:59, Todd Blanchard wrote:
> I've shipped several cordova/phonegap apps.
>
> It can work for a certain level of simplicit
As a person who has posted video of Squeak and Pharo running on
Raspberry Pi, I have to disagree with teh statement "Pharo can already
run on ... Raspberry PI and works well.".
Squeak works well on the Pi, in my experience. It's about an
order-of-magnitude more responsive to user input than Pharo
It's especially important to strategically, it is vital to get Smalltalk/Pharo
to tap into the Java ecosystem if Java itself gets deprecated by Oracle.
Everyone who has a lot of enterprise Java code will need something
that works on the JVM and will easily interoperate with Java
libraries.
On 12
>> I would need to disagree with you as inquiry is possible by description,
>> rather than by name, through conversation with those who don't have to
>> inquire, due to their knowledge [see Meno's Paradox...]. So, a third
>> possibility exists through communal association
> Want to know? Pay the dues.
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Robert Withers
> wrote:
>>
>> I would need to disagree with you as inquiry is possible by description,
>> rather than by name, through conversation with those who don't h
The philosophical issue behind the disutility of project names like
these is "Meno's Paradox"
On 8 December 2015 at 21:01, EuanM wrote:
> "I wish people would choose descriptive names for their projects" - Todd
>
> I agree.
>
> I went looking for the curre
"I wish people would choose descriptive names for their projects" - Todd
I agree.
I went looking for the current state of dbxtalk recently. It seemed
to ba apackage designed for my needs - to X[-over] from a DB to
[small]talk.
I went there and the the page started talking about "Glorp" and
"Gar
I think it's potentially could be provided using Monticello as a basis,
rather than "technically already available through Monticello",
In many ways, you are describing the Catalog Browser / Configurstion
Browser of Pharo, which is built on top of Monticello, Metacello, and
Versionner.
On 7 Dec
Again, you seem to be using "the image" mainly to mean "the .image file",
and only occassionally to mean the actual image itself. They are distinct
(albeit tightly related) things.
On 7 Dec 2015 22:09, "Dimitris Chloupis" wrote:
> And this "victory of dead code and date" that files usually promot
> Look man you do more harm with these articles than you do good.
No. Just... no.
> This Smalltalk hype is the worst of its kind and completely misses the point
> of why Smalltalk is great.
Speaking of "hype(rbole)"...
On 6 December 2015 at 19:58, Dimitris Chloupis wrote:
> "Files belong
>An image IS a file !!!
An image *can be stored to* a file. The image is not the file.
Ceci n'est pas une pipe.
The reason it is image-based is that the image is the primary
representation. The copy of the image stored in a file is simply a
persisting back-up of the image.
Unlike file based s
Cool. Ty.
On 30 November 2015 at 16:40, stepharo wrote:
>
>
> Le 30/11/15 05:27, EuanM a écrit :
>>
>> That's great news.
>>
>> It would be really interesting, and really useful to
>> community-enlargement works, to know:
>>Which part of Tha
as people might think.
Cheers,
EuanM
On 14 November 2015 at 07:40, stepharo wrote:
> Thanks this is nice effort.
>
> Now some remarks:
> - Do you think that great speakers like doru would be invited to prime
> time conference to talk about a language that is from 1980?
>
Thank you for those videos Norbert.
On 2 December 2015 at 12:24, Norbert Hartl wrote:
>
> Am 02.12.2015 um 10:58 schrieb EuanM :
>
> It would be really interesting, and really useful to
> community-enlargement works, to know:
> Which part of Thales drove this?
> What is th
15, at 10:58, EuanM wrote:
>>
>> It would be really interesting, and really useful to
>> community-enlargement works, to know:
>> Which part of Thales drove this?
>> What is their specific interest in Pharo? Or what is their current
>> (or proposed) use
I've been compiling install instructions for the various Smalltalks on
the various platforms at:
Beginning to Smalltalk : How to get a Smalltalk installed and running:
http://beginningtosmalltalk.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/how-to-get-smalltalk-up-and-running.html
Video of the latest production versio
the Consortium wanting to keep this information private?
On 30 November 2015 at 04:27, EuanM wrote:
> That's great news.
>
> It would be really interesting, and really useful to
> community-enlargement works, to know:
> Which part of Thales drove this?
> What is the
requirement. You Ain't Gonna Need it
(YAGNI) is often true, but well-factored code is *always* good.
On 30 November 2015 at 17:02, EuanM wrote:
> Well, personally, I far prefer Mercurial. Which also dethroned SVN.
>
> Mercurial has all the power of Git, while providing a more us
Well, personally, I far prefer Mercurial. Which also dethroned SVN.
Mercurial has all the power of Git, while providing a more usable API.
My mind works like a Smalltalker's, not like Linus's.
It's true, some of the more abstruse functions of git require a longer
chain of user actions in Mercuri
That's great news.
It would be really interesting, and really useful to
community-enlargement works, to know:
Which part of Thales drove this?
What is their specific interest in Pharo? Or what is their current
(or proposed) use of Pharo?
On 26 November 2015 at 13:42, wrote:
> The Pharo
I completed it.
(There was one question that I found hard to understand - so I
commented my response heavily. I can't remember what my issue was -
but my comments would remind me)
On 26 November 2015 at 03:02, Esteban A. Maringolo wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I just created this survey (https://goo.
08, Windows 7, x86 based versions of Mac OS
X, Linux operating systems using the 2.6 kernel and FreeBSD.
Final Question:
===
Is this something we should pass on to the VM teams?
On 22 November 2015 at 20:23, EuanM wrote:
> Because profiling longer loops takes longer.
>
> Why pr
Because profiling longer loops takes longer.
Why profile a 32768-cycle loop if a 2048-cycle loop would work?
On 22 November 2015 at 20:21, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Why do you need to profile fast code? You can always put your code in a loop.
>
> Alexandre
>
>
>> On Nov 22, 2015, at 4:22
Thanks. My medium-term plan is to run my Smalltalk app from a Pi - this was
encouraging!
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/ANN-Working-with-Pharo-on-the-Raspberry-Pi-tp4857895p4858808.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
26 matches
Mail list logo
