Richard O'Keefe wrote
> Seriously, sometimes it's worth it to write good code and then write
> glue code to the required interface.
Maybe "most of the time". Or "It's almost always worth it". Why practice
bad habits? We should reinforce writing good code -- there's not enough of
it out there.
Hello Pharoers
Please distribute around….
Lifeware is looking for smart people and Smalltalkers for positions at
Barcelona.
If you are interested please contact Massimo Arnoldi
mailto:massimo.arno...@lifeware.ch>>
Esteban
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 06:32, LawsonEnglish wrote:
> “Simple inspect” works fine.
>
> THe trace is:
>
> UndefinedObject(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #new
> Message>>sentTo:
> UndefinedObject(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #new
> XMLDocumentHighlightDefaults class(XMLHighlightDefaults
> class)>>textCol
If you were coining a new phrase, the charge of sexism might have some
dubious merit.
(Since it implies that your grandfather is still using outdated stuff,
it is derogatory to males.)
However, the phrase "not your grandfather's " is widely used
to mean "this is
not at all an old-fashioned ", where
I should have remembered that, seeing that I've done 41/42 of the
Pharo exercisms,
and am currently doing the F# ones in my spare time, which I have had
very little of
lately. I have started using the annotation in
such cases to
remind me not to fix the code. Looking back at my solution, I see
t
