What version of Pharo?
`Transcript clear.` does exactly that. :)
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:49 AM, p...@highoctane.be
wrote:
> I am looking for a way to clear the Transcript.
>
> There is no direct command like Transcript clear available.
>
> I do not want to reopen a new one, just be able to cle
I am looking for a way to clear the Transcript.
There is no direct command like Transcript clear available.
I do not want to reopen a new one, just be able to clear one with code, so
that I can leave the window placed properly where I want it.
TIA
Phil
You have also
Natural Smalltalk from hernan.
It sounds like a good basis.
Stef
Le 1/5/16 à 18:50, Evan Donahue a écrit :
Hello,
I added a "MachineLearning" repository to Smalltalkhub a while back, but I
got sidetracked before adding anything beyond a naive KNN classifier, which
was re
for NLP
Olivier started to work on Phonetix
Now there is
https://github.com/mark-watson/nlp_smalltalk
But the lince is GPL3.0
and it looks simple... not sure it is worth to polute your life
with such license.
Stef
Le 1/5/16 à 18:50, Evan Donahue a écrit :
Hello,
I added a "Mac
Hi Even,
let us know! This is highly exciting!
Alexandre
> On May 1, 2016, at 1:50 PM, Evan Donahue wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I added a "MachineLearning" repository to Smalltalkhub a while back, but I
> got sidetracked before adding anything beyond a naive KNN classifier, which
> was really jus
Hello,
I added a "MachineLearning" repository to Smalltalkhub a while back, but I
got sidetracked before adding anything beyond a naive KNN classifier, which
was really just to help prototype the testing framework. That said, my plans
involve expanding the library extensively this summer in conjun
marcus may be we should slowly deprecated ast into cachedParseTree or
something like that.
Le 30/4/16 à 22:25, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit :
Why does CompiledMethod understand both? They are in the same protocol,
produce the same kindOf result, and neither has a method comment! :/ (Pharo
4.0)
Thierry Goubier wrote
> Oh, that's why you were asking for #ast versus #parseTree.
You caught me!
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Create-BaselineOf-from-ConfigurationOf-tp4893076p4893147.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at
Marcus Denker-4 wrote
> #ast returns a result from the cache, while #parseTree always gets a new
> one…
Ah, okay. What is the difference? That is, how/when is the cache updated?
Marcus Denker-4 wrote
> Yes, it could be better. Like always.
:)
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in contex
On 01/05/16 04:00, Arturo Zambrano wrote:
Hi,
I'm using RT on top of pharo5.
As I need to export to pdf, I also installed
RTPDFExporter
and
Artefact
development versions
Exporting to pdf fails with MNU RTPDFVisitor>>visitMapShape:
any hint regarding this?
The PDF exporter has its last up
is for historical reasons… there is no actual reason to not rename them :)
> On 01 May 2016, at 11:06, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
> yes… I am thinking that always when I happen to see it in the setting.
>> On 30 Apr 2016, at 18:35, Peter Uhnák wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> is there some reason why the t
yes… I am thinking that always when I happen to see it in the setting.
> On 30 Apr 2016, at 18:35, Peter Uhnák wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> is there some reason why the theme is called "Pharo 3" and "Pharo3 Dark"… I
> mean we are about to start Pharo 6 so maybe it should just be "Pharo Dark"
> and "Phar
#ast returns a result from the cache, while #parseTree always gets a new one…
yes, it could be documented. Yes, it could be better. Like always.
Marcus
> On 30 Apr 2016, at 22:25, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>
> Why does CompiledMethod understand both? They are in the same protocol,
> prod
13 matches
Mail list logo
