[Pharo-users] [ANN] New ISO 3166-1 Wrapper

2015-08-09 Thread Hernán Morales Durand
Dear all, I developed a Pharo ISO 3166-1 wrapper to access objects into a ISO3166-1 model. See the following post for details on installation and usage: http://80738163270632.blogspot.com.ar/2015/08/new-iso-3166-1-implementation-for-pharo.html I also wrote some documentation about it: https://dl

Re: [Pharo-users] troubles with JNIPort on Pharo 5 / Java 8

2015-08-09 Thread Joachim Geidel
Thanks a lot! I will look into the problem with the test package as soon as possible. Joachim Am 9. August 2015 17:29:42 MESZ, schrieb "Tudor Girba-2 [via Smalltalk]" : > > >Ok. I added now: >- 3.1-alpha with packages for pharo 5 >- development and stable symbolic versions for pharo 3 and ph

Re: [Pharo-users] troubles with JNIPort on Pharo 5 / Java 8

2015-08-09 Thread Tudor Girba
Ok. I added now: - 3.1-alpha with packages for pharo 5 - development and stable symbolic versions for pharo 3 and pharo 5. The tests problem should still be solved. Do you still want to look at that? Once that is done, the tests packages should be added to the version. I can do that. Cheers, Dor

Re: [Pharo-users] Image cannot grow beyond 500Mb

2015-08-09 Thread stepharo
I am trying to use Moose to do run graph algorithms on data with about 300,000 nodes. This data is map data downloaded from OpenStreetMap, and I am trying to analyze it with the Moose-Analysis-Graphs package. This is cool :) Once you fix the problem --memory 1024m do not forget to tell u

Re: [Pharo-users] troubles with JNIPort on Pharo 5 / Java 8

2015-08-09 Thread Joachim Geidel
> Am 09.08.2015 um 14:36 schrieb Tudor Girba-2 [via Smalltalk] > : > However, I notice that you have some distinct version names, and this seems > to throw MC off. For example, when trying to load the latest version of > ConfigurationOfJNIPort: > - we get: ConfigurationOfJNIPort-JoachimGeidel.3

Re: [Pharo-users] troubles with JNIPort on Pharo 5 / Java 8

2015-08-09 Thread Tudor Girba
Hi, Great. However, I notice that you have some distinct version names, and this seems to throw MC off. For example, when trying to load the latest version of ConfigurationOfJNIPort: - we get: ConfigurationOfJNIPort-JoachimGeidel.3.0a3 - instead of: ConfigurationOfJNIPort-JoachimGeidel.3.0a4 Thi

Re: [Pharo-users] troubles with JNIPort on Pharo 5 / Java 8

2015-08-09 Thread Joachim Geidel
Hi Tudor, > Am 09.08.2015 um 13:27 schrieb Tudor Girba: > I tested your changes, and I confirm that the code works fine in Pharo 5. > Now, we just need to get them published :). I tend to avoid words like „just“, „simply“ etc. when talking about software. ;-) The ConfigurationOfJNIPort should

Re: [Pharo-users] troubles with JNIPort on Pharo 5 / Java 8

2015-08-09 Thread Tudor Girba
Hi, I tested your changes, and I confirm that the code works fine in Pharo 5. Now, we just need to get them published :). Cheers, Doru On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi Joachim, > > This is great news! Thanks a lot for looking into this. > > Could you commit your chang

Re: [Pharo-users] troubles with JNIPort on Pharo 5 / Java 8

2015-08-09 Thread Tudor Girba
Hi Joachim, This is great news! Thanks a lot for looking into this. Could you commit your changes? Or could you grant me access to the JNIPort project? Cheers, Doru On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Joachim Geidel < joachim.gei...@onlinehome.de> wrote: > Hi Tudor, > > some progress in Pharo 5

Re: [Pharo-users] MSOffice DOCX generation?

2015-08-09 Thread H. Hirzel
And as Model 0 Model 0 Subset --- Headings Tables (here comes your TABULAR model into action) This means it can be a TabularDOCXExport class in http://ss3.gemtalksystems.com/ss/Tabular.html for a start. On 8/9/15, H. Hirzel wrote: > I consider an evolution of models with

Re: [Pharo-users] troubles with JNIPort on Pharo 5 / Java 8

2015-08-09 Thread Joachim Geidel
Hi Tudor, some progress in Pharo 5: > Am 28.07.2015 um 16:10 schrieb Tudor Girba-2 [via Smalltalk] > : > > I also tried with Pharo4 and Pharo5, but it does not work because I get a MNU > for GhostClassBuilder>>#client:. > > I fixed it in a Pharo5 image by using #installer: instead, but the >

Re: [Pharo-users] MSOffice DOCX generation?

2015-08-09 Thread H. Hirzel
I consider an evolution of models with increasing complexity The goal is to have at least something as here but in certain areas more http://davidgohel.github.io/ReporteRs/word.html So it is Model 1 Subset --- Headings Paragraphs Tables (here comes your TABULAR model in

Re: [Pharo-users] MSOffice DOCX generation?

2015-08-09 Thread Юрий Мироненко
And talking about DOCX generation: it looks like the hardest part is to implement *model*. DOCX generation is boring but straightforward. Can you try to implement/describe such a model? 2015-08-08 22:25 GMT+03:00 Юрий Мироненко : > Sorry if I was crude - it was not my intention :) > I just spott