Ok. I added now: - 3.1-alpha with packages for pharo 5 - development and stable symbolic versions for pharo 3 and pharo 5.
The tests problem should still be solved. Do you still want to look at that? Once that is done, the tests packages should be added to the version. I can do that. Cheers, Doru On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Joachim Geidel <joachim.gei...@onlinehome.de > wrote: > > > Am 09.08.2015 um 14:36 schrieb Tudor Girba-2 [via Smalltalk] <[hidden > email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4841820&i=0>>: > > However, I notice that you have some distinct version names, and this > seems to throw MC off. For example, when trying to load the latest version > of ConfigurationOfJNIPort: > > - we get: ConfigurationOfJNIPort-JoachimGeidel.3.0a3 > > - instead of: ConfigurationOfJNIPort-JoachimGeidel.3.0a4 > > > > This problem would be fixed if we would change the numbering a bit. For > example, when I try to commit a new version of the configuration, > Monticello offers: > > ConfigurationOfJNIPort-TudorGirba.3.5 > > > > Is it Ok if I commit it like this? > > Yes, of course, do whatever it takes. I used the „aN“ suffer because I > considered that version as an alpha release, and wanted to do a lot more > before publishing a „real“ release. > > Cheers, > Joachim > > > ------------------------------ > View this message in context: Re: troubles with JNIPort on Pharo 5 / Java > 8 > <http://forum.world.st/troubles-with-JNIPort-on-Pharo-5-Java-8-tp4836922p4841820.html> > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive > <http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html> at Nabble.com. > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
