Thanks Markus for the feedback.
Hilaire
Le 04/04/2014 10:09, Marcus Denker a écrit :
> So… yes, right now there are no Preferences. But we can add them back.
> (I can do that).
>
> The only thin that will (right now) not work is decompiling, but just running
> a program is fine. If you want to d
Hi Stephan,
Yes, we have discussed with Guillaume. We don't have a better solution to
propose but we will be really interested if someone write a portable JPEG
support. It will be cool to have the possibility to extract header
informations from pictures without using a plugin.
Best regards
201
Le 04/04/2014 12:04, MartinW a écrit :
Goubier Thierry wrote
By the way, any chance of having your code as an example for Spec? I
went through the spec documentation and I couldn't see anything similar,
and, from our difficulties to get that to work, I would guess a bit of
work on Spec drag an
Goubier Thierry wrote
> By the way, any chance of having your code as an example for Spec? I
> went through the spec documentation and I couldn't see anything similar,
> and, from our difficulties to get that to work, I would guess a bit of
> work on Spec drag and drop support could be a good th
Goubier Thierry wrote
> Yes, I've seen that. It's fine by me that the list displayed in the
> widget is copied and sorted, just that I would have liked to be able to
> touch the true collection hidden inside the ListModel. Unless the list
> model is more like a ListAdaptor in meaning, in which c
Le 04/04/2014 10:41, Benjamin a écrit :
Why not, but this will not solve the issue :)
I will probably fix that in the train today (5h long trip to Bordeaux ^^)
.
I'm nice to give you something to do during those 5 hours, then ;)
The issue is that the items are sorted by default, which means
Why not, but this will not solve the issue :)
I will probably fix that in the train today (5h long trip to Bordeaux ^^)
.
The issue is that the items are sorted by default, which means that
the list is populated with a copy of the items provided.
Maybe it should not :)
Then for the convenient me
If you need it the other way around, then instead of calling it in the layout,
there is a method on adapter named #buildWidget (or something close)
which is the perfect place for this :)
Ben
On 04 Apr 2014, at 01:53, Thomas Bany wrote:
> Okey so I looked deeper into the interpreter and found t
On 03 Apr 2014, at 19:05, Hilaire Fernandes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is gone. And for me it is a very annoying.
>
> Now if you want the system to prevent looking I am afraid you have to
> modify some system class method as there is no more hook to do it
> properly (see the mailing list archive for
Hi Ben,
I think that hard-linking the collections inside the drop block isn't
working in that case, so you have to write that without any reference to
collection1 and collection2 :)
But, since you're here: why don't I have an API to add or remove items
from the ListModel instance? If I was w
Le 03/04/2014 22:55, MartinW a écrit :
Goubier Thierry wrote
Another approach, that I would use, is to put more complex objects
inside the lists. Thoses objects would know how to get added / removed
from their respective collections, and then I would propagate collection
changes to the ListMod
11 matches
Mail list logo
