Hi Stephan, Yes, we have discussed with Guillaume. We don't have a better solution to propose but we will be really interested if someone write a portable JPEG support. It will be cool to have the possibility to extract header informations from pictures without using a plugin.
Best regards 2014-04-03 16:02 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Larcheveque < guillaume.larcheve...@gmail.com>: > If I remember well, we used this way to get some data about image required > by PDF format. > > Maybe there is a smarter way to do this, I will have a look with Olivier > about this. > > > 2014-04-03 10:32 GMT+02:00 Stephan Eggermont <step...@stack.nl>: > > Reg Krock took a look at how difficult it would be to port Artefact to >> Gemstone. >> He found that JPEG support uses a plugin based reader/writer, and seems to >> render the JPEG using BitBlt and Form. >> >> Why are JPEGs rendered? I'd think embedding them should be enough >> (and be better for speed and image quality) >> >> Stephan >> > > > > -- > *Guillaume Larcheveque* > >
