Re: [Pharo-users] InputEventSensor and polling

2013-05-15 Thread Eric Clack
Hi Stephane and Jannik, Well I don't hate the code (yet ;-) So perhaps I'll have a play with it a bit more and see if I can get something that works well, and fits with plans for Pharo3.0. Cheers, -Eric. On 15 May 2013 21:16, jannik.laval wrote: > Thank you Stef. > > What I understand is that

Re: [Pharo-users] InputEventSensor and polling

2013-05-15 Thread jannik.laval
Thank you Stef. What I understand is that we should make Phratch works, modifying InputEventSensor. Then we will modify Phratch when Pharo3.0 will be enough stable to port it. Cheers, Jannik On May 15, 2013, at 9:15 PM, stephane ducasse wrote: > > > I hate this code :) > I remember that in

Re: [Pharo-users] InputEventSensor and polling

2013-05-15 Thread stephane ducasse
I hate this code :) I remember that in the EventModel we had to store the previous event somehow but this was one year ago. I should go back to the code one of these days. So for now I say make Phrath working we will check the kernel later. Stef > But as far as I can see, that "if key pressed

Re: [Pharo-users] InputEventSensor and polling

2013-05-15 Thread Eric Clack
Hi Stephane, On 15 May 2013 18:35, stephane ducasse wrote: > Hi eric > Why do you need to poll for event? > I'd rather not poll as it seems inefficient, but the logic and ordering of the Scratch commands seems to dictate that it is necessary. Here's my example pseudo code from that picture of

[Pharo-users] About the Mailinglist debacle...

2013-05-15 Thread Marcus Denker
Hello, So now that everything is working… sorry for the mess. We should have left the gforge infrastructure the last time we had a multi-day problem, not wait till we get it again. I think this will be my new principle: second real problem -> I leave. No discussions. We already saw with the je

Re: [Pharo-users] a 'doesNotUnderstand' message that I do not understand...

2013-05-15 Thread Mariano Martinez Peck
If you does not understand a #doesNotUnderstand: it seem you are going META to me hehehe. On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Alain Busser wrote: > Hi all, > > Exploring the system browser (Pharo 2.0), I see that there exists a class > called TextEditorDialogWindow; as this name sounds interesting

Re: [Pharo-users] a 'doesNotUnderstand' message that I do not understand...

2013-05-15 Thread Alain Busser
So it was that simple! Thanks alot for these messages, now I will be able to make *new* and *classy* things instantly :-D Alain On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Chris wrote: > This method is on the instance side of the class and therefore requires > TextEditorDialogWindow new newTextEditorMo

Re: [Pharo-users] InputEventSensor and polling

2013-05-15 Thread stephane ducasse
Hi eric > Hi all, > I've been working on Phratch, a port of MIT Scratch to Pharo, mostly to learn > Smalltalk and also because Scratch is a great learning environment and I > can't bear to see it end up in Flash. > > So I've been digging about in the old code to fix bugs and I'm getting a >

Re: [Pharo-users] Zn maximumEntitySize

2013-05-15 Thread Pierce Ng
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 01:51:15PM +0200, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > If you do > ConfigurationOfZincHTTPComponents project bleedingEdge load. > from > http://mc.stfx.eu/ZincHTTPComponents > you will find some new ZnServerTests > http://ws.stfx.eu/D8X1CFAEQODI Cool! I'll try

Re: [Pharo-users] Zn maximumEntitySize

2013-05-15 Thread Pierce Ng
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:58:12PM +0200, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > ZnEntityTooLarge is a condition that is signaled by the server when it is > receiving (reading) an incoming entity that is too large. This is done to > protect the server. This condition is only applicable to ZnEntity and > su

[Pharo-users] InputEventSensor and polling

2013-05-15 Thread Eric Clack
Hi all, I've been working on Phratch, a port of MIT Scratch to Pharo, mostly to learn Smalltalk and also because Scratch is a great learning environment and I can't bear to see it end up in Flash. So I've been digging about in the old code to fix bugs and I'm getting a sense that there's some conf

Re: [Pharo-users] success story: NTed

2013-05-15 Thread Norbert Hartl
Manfred, thanks. Maybe I missed that when starting with the old version of amber. I'm glad google closure compiler is supposed to work. If it works for the server I'm positive it'll work on the client. Major problems are IMHO if you have variable additions that use underscore as prefix etc. and

Re: [Pharo-users] [amber-lang] [Pharo-dev] success story: NTed

2013-05-15 Thread Norbert Hartl
Nico, thanks for your helpful input. I will try all of these when the project enters the next phase. Well, I will measure the startup times soon because it influences the do or don't of using it in new projects. Norbert Am 15.05.2013 um 12:12 schrieb Nicolas Petton : > Hi Norbert, > > I'm an

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] success story: NTed

2013-05-15 Thread Nicolas Petton
Hi Norbert, I'm answering inside your email. If you'd like more explanations about some of the points, please just tell me. I'm also forwarding to Amber ML. On May 14, 2013, at 5:37 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > Hi Nico, > >> I do have one question: what was your experience with Amber? >> > >