[PERFORM] Memory reporting on CentOS Linux

2009-08-14 Thread Jeremy Carroll
I am confused about what the OS is reporting for memory usage on CentOS 5.3 Linux. Looking at the resident memory size of the processes. Looking at the resident size of all postgres processes, the system should be using around 30Gb of physical ram. I know that it states that it is using a lot of

Re: [PERFORM] Memory reporting on CentOS Linux

2009-08-14 Thread Jeremy Carroll
But the kernel can take back any of the cache memory if it wants to. Therefore it is free memory. This still does not explain why the top command is reporting ~9GB of resident memory, yet the top command does not suggest that any physical memory is being used. On 8/14/09 2:43 PM, "Reid Thomps

Re: [PERFORM] Memory reporting on CentOS Linux

2009-08-15 Thread Jeremy Carroll
[mailto:sc...@richrelevance.com] Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 3:38 PM To: Jeremy Carroll; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Memory reporting on CentOS Linux On 8/14/09 11:00 AM, "Jeremy Carroll" wrote: > I am confused about what the OS is reporting for memory usag

Re: [PERFORM] Memory reporting on CentOS Linux

2009-08-15 Thread Jeremy Carroll
olumn "-/+ buffers/cache:". That shows 46Gb Free RAM. I cannot be the only person that has asked this question. -Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 10:25 AM To: Jeremy Carroll Cc: Scott Carey; pgsql-performance@postgresql.

Re: [PERFORM] Memory reporting on CentOS Linux

2009-08-17 Thread Jeremy Carroll
I believe this is exactly what is happening. I see that the TOP output lists a large amount ov VIRT & RES size being used, but the kernel does not report this memory as being reserved and instead lists it as free memory or cached. If this is indeed the case, how does one determine if a PostgreSQ