2008/1/28, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Do we have nominations for a name? The first idea that comes to mind
> is "synchronized_scanning" (defaulting to ON).
"synchronized_sequential_scans" is a bit long, but contains the
keyword "sequential scans", which will ring a bell with many, more so
2008/2/8, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:22:42PM +0100, Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
> >> while we are at it -- one feature would be great for 8.4, an
> >> ability to shange shared buffers size "on the fly".
>
> > Sha
2008/2/8, Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
> > git or its ilk would impact the lives of submitters and reviewers most.
> > Basically it would allow two non-committers to collaborate, something
which we
> > can't really do effectively now.
>
> Two git-using non-committe
when the new index is ready,
in order to delete the old index, elevate that lock to an exclusive
one?
Markus
--
Markus Bertheau
Blog: http://www.bluetwanger.de/blog/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an ap
On Mon, 2002-09-16 at 10:52, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Developers mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm, that list does not appear on the sourceforge Lists page. Why?
--
Markus Bertheau.
Berlin, Berlin.
Germany.
---(end of broadc
В Птн, 13.06.2003, в 20:02, Oleg Bartunov пишет:
> Hi there,
>
> I've managed to get postgresql working with UTF8 and KOI8.
> Here is some mini-howto:
> http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/utf8.html
The correct name for UTF-8 locales is xx_XX.UTF-8, not upper case and
th
В Вск, 15.06.2003, в 21:08, Markus Bertheau пишет:
> The correct name for UTF-8 locales is xx_XX.UTF-8, not upper case and
s/not/note/
> the minus.
--
Markus Bertheau.
Berlin, Berlin.
Germany.
---(end of bro
his setup here, any
idea why this is the case?
--
Markus Bertheau.
Berlin, Berlin.
Germany.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
В Пнд, 16.06.2003, в 01:26, Oleg Bartunov пишет:
> Markus,
>
> I suspect lower,upper will not works with Unicode.
It doesn't work with KOI8-R here, too.
--
Markus Bertheau.
Berlin, Berlin.
Germany.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: y
Hi,
I'm trying to build cvs, but it fails:
bison -y -d preproc.y
preproc.y:6214: fatal error: maximum table size (32767) exceeded
make[4]: *** [preproc.h] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/home/bert/src/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc'
What's the problem?
--
Markus B
В Втр, 01.07.2003, в 21:41, Larry Rosenman пишет:
> what version of bison are you using? I believe we require 1.875 these days.
1.35. I'll upgrade. Thanks.
--
Markus Bertheau.
Berlin, Berlin.
Germany.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8:
createdb failed
make: *** [check] Ошибка 2
--
Markus Bertheau.
Berlin, Berlin.
Germany.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
В Втр, 01.07.2003, в 22:53, Jeff пишет:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 10:28:12PM +0200, Markus Bertheau wrote:
> > make check fails, and I have absolutely no idea where to look:
> >
> > running on port 65432 with pid 631
> > == cr
В Втр, 01.07.2003, в 23:30, Tom Lane пишет:
> Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > make check fails, and I have absolutely no idea where to look:
>
> > running on port 65432 with pid 631
> > == creating database "regression"
see
overriding as an advantage, too, because misparsing of the bison version
string would just be a bug that had to be fixed, imo. You can as well
modify configure in that case to make it compile, and send the patch to
the bison version parser in afterwards.
Maybe add a comment to the Makefile
В Срд, 02.07.2003, в 01:10, Alvaro Herrera пишет:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 12:56:11AM +0200, Markus Bertheau wrote:
>
> > Maybe add a comment to the Makefile where bison is called that gives a
> > hint to the user in case bison fails.
>
> Not too many people read Makefi
В Втр, 05.08.2003, в 05:23, The Hermit Hacker пишет:
> /usr/bin/cvs -d /cvsroot -q checkout -rREL7_4_BETA1 -P pgsql
> /usr/bin/find pgsql -type d -name CVS -print | xargs rm -rf
Hint: cvs export
--
Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: =?koi8-r?Q?=FC=D4=C
with temp tables in a given session. So I was thinking about
> making the default value fairly robust, maybe 1000 (as compared to
> the historical value of 64...).
Why does the dba need to set that variable at all then?
--
Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Descr
ing through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ncode the XML output as UTF-8, which would make the
files more readable for humans if the text data is not ASCII.
Markus
--
Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Dnia 24-05-2005, wto o godzinie 00:06 -0400, Tom Lane napisał(a):
> Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Markus Bertheau wrote:
> >> why does SELECT ARRAY(SELECT 1 WHERE FALSE) return NULL instead of
> >> ARRAY[] resp. '{}'?
>
> > W
Ð ÐÐÐ, 22.03.2004, Ð 00:12, Tom Lane ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> Please repost in some less proprietary format. Plain text is generally
> considered the thing to use on this list.
--
Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pg_autovacuum Version 2
Design Document:
Exec Summary:
pg_autovacuum was initia
NICODE to UTF-8
because UNICODE really just isn't an encoding.
--
Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/bert/src/postgresql-7.4.2/doc'
make: *** [install] Error 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] postgresql-7.4.2]$
make and make check worked ok.
--
Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
tmaster, have a beer.
The question whether we should prevent this from happening stands; I
think we should.
--
Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
ause after that, we don't have any more major number to jump into
> without going into 2 digits.
What's the problem with 7.10?
--
Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
Hi hackers,
can this be made a TODO?
Thanks
--
Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Begin Message ---
Markus Bertheau wrote:
Hi,
PostgreSQL doesn't allow the creation of a foreign key to a combination
of fields that has got no dedicated unique key but is unique nonetheless
becau
Forwarding to -hackers as per README
-Пересланное сообщение-
From: Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [BUGS] pg_autovacuum segv
Date: 09 Oct 2003 17:30:48 +0200
(gdb) run
Starting program: /root/src/postgresql-7.4beta4/contrib/pg_autovacuum/pg_auto
schema_a.tab
completes the table.
--
Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
ed numeric equivalents into this
> macro?
What not ASCII compatible character sets are out there in use still
today?
--
Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
ead), with the intention of removing it in
> 7.3.
I didn't find such a notice in the 7.2 release notes.
Markus Bertheau
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
Hi,
What's the status of the TODO item
"Allow commenting of variables in postgresql.conf to restore them to defaults
Currently, if a variable is commented out, it keeps the previous
uncommented value until a server restarted."
I take that to apply to the configuration re-read at
er() calls ProcessConfigFile() which calls
ParseConfigFile() which reads postgresql.conf.
For me that means that postgresql.conf in read in the signal handler,
which contradicts the claim in the README. Where's my error?
Markus Bertheau
---(end of broadcast)--
2006/3/6, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> The comment is referring to the control flow in a backend; you're
> looking at the postmaster's sighup handler, which is different.
Then the following comment patch is appropriate, afaics.
Markus Bertheau
Index
Hi,
this is the plan: In ParseConfigFile, record the fact that the
variable was set in response to SIG_HUP in the status field
(GUC_SET_FROM_SIGHUP). After setting all variables in postgresql.conf,
set all variables that can appear in postgresql.conf
(GUC_DISALLOW_IN_FILE), don't have their built-
connections on Unix domain socket "/tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432"?
Previous connection kept
Why is it trying to use 5432? Am I missing something? Is that the
expected behaviour?
Michael Fuhr hinted that
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-02/msg00139.php
may be the cause of that.
Marku
e name does not unambiguously identify a database, but having a
history for each database name is already an improvement over the
current situation.
Markus Bertheau
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
" for every database.
--
Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
what the subversion book has to say about that:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/svnbook-1.1/ch05.html#svn-ch-5-sect-1.2.A
We use svn over ssh and recently switched to fsfs because of the umask
problem and because read-only access to bdb causes writes to the
database.
--
Markus Berthea
the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if
> your joining column's datatypes do not match (upgrade to 8.0!)
>
> We could change this now...
>
> ...and add another TIP to encourage people to upgrade...?
>
--
Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PRO
s?
http://www.gnome.org/~jdub/blog/2005/Feb/11
>
> thanks,
> Jaime Casanova
>
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Des
В Втр, 24/05/2005 в 00:06 -0400, Tom Lane пишет:
> Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Markus Bertheau wrote:
> >> why does SELECT ARRAY(SELECT 1 WHERE FALSE) return NULL instead of
> >> ARRAY[] resp. '{}'?
>
> > Why would you expect an
В Пнд, 06/06/2005 в 10:44 -0400, Tom Lane пишет:
> Markus Bertheau =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=98=AD?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > By analogy, array_upper('{}'::TEXT[], 1) should return 0 instead of
> > NULL.
>
> No, that doesn't follow ... we've traditionally
an 0. I don't know why it was decided to do that in the
first place. It seems a rather odd feature to me.
Markus
--
Markus Bertheau ☭ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send a
olean
(), quote_date() and so on. For the sake of completeness I think these
functions should exist. While the use of to_char() resp. decode() for
some types is possible, it does feel like a workaround to me. Opinions?
Do these functions belong in the PostgreSQL core?
--
Markus Bertheau ☭ <[EMAIL P
В Пнд, 20/06/2005 в 10:01 -0400, Tom Lane пишет:
> Markus Bertheau =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=98=AD?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm writing an application with a lot of PL/pgSQL and am constructing
> > SQL queries on the fly. The quote_literal() and quote_ident() functions
&
В Пнд, 20/06/2005 в 10:10 -0400, Tom Lane пишет:
> Markus Bertheau =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=98=AD?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Maybe quote_* is not the right name, but the functionality is needed.
>
> I don't think so --- at least not in plpgsql, which can do this already.
&g
47 matches
Mail list logo