Ð ÐÑÐ, 05.11.2004, Ð 21:40, Heikki Linnakangas ÐÐÑÐÑ: > On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Travis P wrote: > > > Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >> Interestingly, the subversion repository is 585MB, and the CVS repository > > is only 260MB, > > > > BDB or FSFS back-end? FSFS seems to require less space. (The BDB backend > > tends to pre-allocate space though, so maybe there was a big jump, but then > > growth will slow markedly, so making a comparison for a repository that will > > continue to grow is difficult.) > > BDB.
Here's what the subversion book has to say about that: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/svnbook-1.1/ch05.html#svn-ch-5-sect-1.2.A We use svn over ssh and recently switched to fsfs because of the umask problem and because read-only access to bdb causes writes to the database. -- Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
