Oliver Jowett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> However, I would still like to know why 7.4 didn't show the same
>> misbehavior, when it isn't using this flag.
> It looks like the 7.4 code never unblocks signals in the collector
> process, so that process never gets stopped by SIGT
Tom Lane wrote:
Oliver Jowett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I think pqsignal should be passing SA_NOCLDSTOP in sa_flags,
With that patch applied, the problem is indeed gone on my system.
However, I would still like to know why 7.4 didn't show the same
misbehavior, when it isn't using this flag.
It l
Oliver Jowett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think pqsignal should be passing SA_NOCLDSTOP in sa_flags,
With that patch applied, the problem is indeed gone on my system.
However, I would still like to know why 7.4 didn't show the same
misbehavior, when it isn't using this flag.
Oliver Jowett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think pqsignal should be passing SA_NOCLDSTOP in sa_flags,
Hmm, that does look like a good idea ... but it does not explain why 7.4
doesn't have the same problem.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)
Tom Lane wrote:
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In that context, is SIGTSTP similar to SIGSTOP in that it cannot be
caught or ignored?
Possibly. I've reproduced the problem here on an RHL 8 system
(2.4.18 kernel) and I think it's a kernel bug. Points:
[...]
I can reproduce this on a 2.6.7
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In that context, is SIGTSTP similar to SIGSTOP in that it cannot be
> caught or ignored?
Possibly. I've reproduced the problem here on an RHL 8 system
(2.4.18 kernel) and I think it's a kernel bug. Points:
1. AFAICS, the only case where the stats buffer
On 8/14/2004 11:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I see stats collector processes die in current when I suspend
postmaster then put it in background from a terminal:
Is this normal?
Doesn't 7.4 behave the same?
It looks to me like 7.4 and current have the same signal
> Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I see stats collector processes die in current when I suspend
> > postmaster then put it in background from a terminal:
>
> > Is this normal?
>
> Doesn't 7.4 behave the same?
No.
> It looks to me like 7.4 and current have the same signal handling.
Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I see stats collector processes die in current when I suspend
> postmaster then put it in background from a terminal:
> Is this normal?
Doesn't 7.4 behave the same?
It looks to me like 7.4 and current have the same signal handling.
I'm not sure why a ts
