Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
>
> >In the meantime would'nt it be nice to try to understand what happens and
> >correct it?
> >
> >I'm a bit afraid that 8.1 is not used on unixware because people don't
> >have/want the patch installed.
> >
> >
> >
>
> All the evidence is t
On Jul 27 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
>
> > In the meantime would'nt it be nice to try to understand what happens
> > and correct it?
> >
> >I'm a bit afraid that 8.1 is not used on unixware because people don't
> >have/want the patch install
On Jul 27 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
>In the meantime would'nt it be nice to try to understand what happens and
>correct it?
>
>I'm a bit afraid that 8.1 is not used on unixware because people don't
>have/want the patch installed.
>
>
>
All the evidence is that this
ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
In the meantime would'nt it be nice to try to understand what happens and
correct it?
I'm a bit afraid that 8.1 is not used on unixware because people don't
have/want the patch installed.
All the evidence is that this is a compiler bug. The apparent workaround
for
ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
> In the meantime would'nt it be nice to try to understand what happens
> and correct it?
>
> I'm a bit afraid that 8.1 is not used on unixware because people
> don't have/want the patch installed.
>
> Regards
Let's see what they find, first. They may have a work-around (
0500
> From: Larry Rosenman
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> 'pgsql-hackers list'
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS
>
> On Jul 26 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:26:20 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Larry Rosenman
> Cc: ohp@pyrenet.fr, 'pgsql-hackers list'
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS
>
> "Larry Rosenm
On Jul 26 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> FWIW, I just checked that CVS tip works OK for me without these options,
> with either integer or float timestamps. I don't see any new warnings,
> either.
> It could well be that the recent changes have introduced so
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Larry Rosenman" writes:
>> For those following along at home:
>
>> Removing --enable-cassert and --enable-debug from the options causes
>> Firefly to fail.
>
> FWIW, I just checked that CVS tip works OK for me without these
> options, with either integer or float timestamps.
"Larry Rosenman" writes:
> For those following along at home:
> Removing --enable-cassert and --enable-debug from the options causes
> Firefly to fail.
FWIW, I just checked that CVS tip works OK for me without these options,
with either integer or float timestamps. I don't see any new warnings,
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>
>>> Date: 25 Jul 2005 12:47:01 -0500
>>> From: Larry Rosenman
>>> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
>>> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
>>> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] r
Larry Rosenman wrote:
ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Date: 25 Jul 2005 12:47:01 -0500
From: Larry Rosenman
To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS
On Jul 25 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote
man
>>>> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
>>>> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
>>>> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 25 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>&g
ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
>> Date: 25 Jul 2005 12:47:01 -0500
>> From: Larry Rosenman
>> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
>> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
>> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS
>>
>>
./configure
>
> This is the problem I have.
>
> Regards
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
> > Date: 25 Jul 2005 09:00:41 -0500
> > From: Larry Rosenman
> > To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> > Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] r
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Date: 25 Jul 2005 12:47:01 -0500
> From: Larry Rosenman
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS
>
> On Jul 25 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
>
> > Hi Larry,
On Jul 25 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Date: 25 Jul 2005 12:47:01 -0500
> From: Larry Rosenman
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS
>
> On Jul 25 2005,
On Jul 25 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
Hi Larry,
I'm quitge sure you'll see a problem if you remove --enable-debug
--enable-cassert from your ./configure
Do we have a clue as to which .c module the compiler/optimizer is (possibly)
screwing up?
I have connections in SCO's compiler group
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression failure on latest CVS
>
> On Jul 25 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
>
> > Sorry to follow up my own post but this is weird.
> >
> > I've tested again and more closely.
> > And intervall check is ok w
On Jul 25 2005, ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
Sorry to follow up my own post but this is weird.
I've tested again and more closely.
And intervall check is ok when configured with --enable-debug and fails
(with the same error) otherwise.
It could be a compiler optimizer bug or the way the code is writt
Sorry to follow up my own post but this is weird.
I've tested again and more closely.
And intervall check is ok when configured with --enable-debug and fails
(with the same error) otherwise.
It could be a compiler optimizer bug or the way the code is written.
Could someone point me to the source
21 matches
Mail list logo
