Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: > > >In the meantime would'nt it be nice to try to understand what happens and > >correct it? > > > >I'm a bit afraid that 8.1 is not used on unixware because people don't > >have/want the patch installed. > > > > > > > > All the evidence is that this is a compiler bug. The apparent workaround > for now would be to compile with optimisation turned off. Or use another > compiler - gcc is available isn't it?
The SCO compiler was a buggy mess with any optimization turned on 10 years ago, and it still is. I see no reason our community should waste time helping fix such a buggy compiler. If it was buggy for the past 10 years, I think it will be buggy for the next 10 too. We should just turn off optimization for that compiler. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
