On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:46 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> > On the flip side, if we don't provide review to WIP patches during the
> > 3rd commitfest, how do we expect to get anything close to committable on
> > the 1st commitfest of the next cycle
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On the flip side, if we don't provide review to WIP patches during the
> 3rd commitfest, how do we expect to get anything close to committable on
> the 1st commitfest of the next cycle?
I'm not sure exactly what you're going for here, because I
pg...@j-davis.com (Jeff Davis) writes:
> On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 15:10 -0500, Chris Browne wrote:
>> It's more than a bit sad... The RangeType change has the massive merit
>> of enabling some substantial development changes, where we can get rid
>> of whole classes of comparison clauses, and hopeful
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 15:10 -0500, Chris Browne wrote:
> It's more than a bit sad... The RangeType change has the massive merit
> of enabling some substantial development changes, where we can get rid
> of whole classes of comparison clauses, and hopefully whole classes of
> range errors. That wa
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:25 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > The patch is a million little decisions: names, catalog structure,
> > interface, representation, general usability, grammar, functionality,
> > etc. Without some checkpoint, the chances that everyone agrees with all
> > of these decisions a
> This discussion reveals that it's time to start making some
> discussions about what can be accomplished for 9.1 and what must be
> postponed to 9.2. The big ones I think we should postpone are:
First off, I think that this is a little premature. As others have
pointed out, the unusual schedu
pg...@j-davis.com (Jeff Davis) writes:
> On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 06:57 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> > - Range Types. This is a large patch which was submitted for the
>> > first time to the last CommitFest of the cycle, and the first version
>> > tha
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:13 PM, David Fetter wrote:
>> I agree that we have some problems in that area - particularly with
>> writeable CTEs - but prolonging the schedule isn't going to fix that
>> problem.
>
> What is?
I think the best solution would probably be to find corporate sponsors
for mo
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 22:37 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> - Range Types. This is a large patch which was submitted for the
>> first time to the last CommitFest of the cycle, and the first version
>> that had no open TODO items was posted yesterda
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 11:56 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> It's a 5400 line patch that wasn't completed until the middle of the
> current CommitFest. Nobody has ever submitted a major feature patch
> of that size that got done in a single CommitFest, to my recollection,
> or even half that size.
My
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 02:04:04PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:02 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> > Given how things worked, i.e. that people were not clear that 9.1
> > development had actually started, etc., I am again proposing that we
> > have one more CF starting March 15 t
* Jeff Davis (pg...@j-davis.com) wrote:
> I appreciate the sentiment, but in addition to some cleanup, any patch
> like this at least requires some discussion. It's a language change
> we'll be supporting for a long time.
My feeling was that we have had at least some of that discussion this
past f
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 06:57 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > - Range Types. This is a large patch which was submitted for the
> > first time to the last CommitFest of the cycle, and the first version
> > that had no open TODO items was posted yesterday
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:02 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> Given how things worked, i.e. that people were not clear that 9.1
> development had actually started, etc., I am again proposing that we
> have one more CF starting March 15 to get this all cleaned up. Yes, I
> know that wasn't the plan, but I
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 22:37 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> - Range Types. This is a large patch which was submitted for the
> first time to the last CommitFest of the cycle, and the first version
> that had no open TODO items was posted yesterday, three-quarters of
> the way through that last CommitF
On tis, 2011-02-08 at 00:16 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
> On 11-02-07 10:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> > - The PL/python extravaganza. I'm not really clear where we stand
> > with this. There are a lot of patches here.
> >
>
> Some of the patches have been committed a few others are ready (or
>
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:37:06PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Chris Browne wrote:
> > It sure looks to me like there are going to be a bunch of items that,
> > based on the recognized policies, need to get deferred to 9.2, and the
> > prospects for Sync Rep getting
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Chris Browne wrote:
> sfr...@snowman.net (Stephen Frost) writes:
>> * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>> - Range Types. This is a large patch which was submitted for the
>>> first time to the last CommitFest of the cycle, and the first version
>>> that
On 11-02-08 10:07 AM, Jan Urbański wrote:
* custom SPI exceptions - I'd really like this one to go in, because it
allows writing UPSERT-kind functions in PL/Python very easily, and it's
just a handful of lines of code
I will try to do a review of this one (probably tomorrow night) since
I'
sfr...@snowman.net (Stephen Frost) writes:
> * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> - Range Types. This is a large patch which was submitted for the
>> first time to the last CommitFest of the cycle, and the first version
>> that had no open TODO items was posted yesterday, three-quarters
On 08/02/11 15:44, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> 2011/2/8 Steve Singer :
>> On 11-02-07 10:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>>> - The PL/python extravaganza. I'm not really clear where we stand
>>> with this. There are a lot of patches here.
>>>
>>
>> Some of the patches have been committed a few others ar
2011/2/8 Steve Singer :
> On 11-02-07 10:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> - The PL/python extravaganza. I'm not really clear where we stand
>> with this. There are a lot of patches here.
>>
>
> Some of the patches have been committed a few others are ready (or almost
> ready) for a committer. The
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> - Range Types. This is a large patch which was submitted for the
> first time to the last CommitFest of the cycle, and the first version
> that had no open TODO items was posted yesterday, three-quarters of
> the way through that last CommitFest. Som
On 11-02-07 10:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
- The PL/python extravaganza. I'm not really clear where we stand
with this. There are a lot of patches here.
Some of the patches have been committed a few others are ready (or
almost ready) for a committer. The table function one is the only one
24 matches
Mail list logo
