Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> defaulting to the beginning if not found.
> >> Examples: "%T [%P]: " (everybody gets timestamp and pid)
> >> "%T [%P]: [EMAIL PROTECTED](%C:%S %I line:%L %X%T [%P]:" (same
> >> effect
> >> as example under previous point)
> >> - something
Bruce Momjian said:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> I haven't had any other feedback on this patch that I posted. However,
>> I'm a bit dissatisfied with it for a couple of reasons:
>>
>> . when a connection is logged we don't yet know the user and database,
>> because we haven't processed the init
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> I haven't had any other feedback on this patch that I posted. However,
> I'm a bit dissatisfied with it for a couple of reasons:
>
> . when a connection is logged we don't yet know the user and database,
> because we haven't processed the initial packet yet. That cause
Tom Lane said:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines
>> with info via a printf-style string.
>
>> Any comments or suggestions before I start?
>
> I think Bruce already applied the previous version of your patch.
Not that
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines with
> info via a printf-style string.
> Any comments or suggestions before I start?
I think Bruce already applied the previous version of your patch. No
problem with yanking it out f
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines
with info via a printf-style string.
Current plans are to call the config parameter "log_line_info" and
implement the following escapes:
%U = user
%D = database
%T = timestamp
%P
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> > I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines with
> > info via a printf-style string.
> >
> > Current plans are to call the config parameter "log_line_info" and
> > implement the following escapes:
> >
> > %U = user
>
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines with
info via a printf-style string.
Current plans are to call the config parameter "log_line_info" and
implement the following escapes:
%U = user
%D = database
%T = timestamp
%P = pid
%L = session log line
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Rod Taylor wrote:
>
> >>and I'm willing to entertain other suggestions.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Very nice, but you missed the most important. Command Tag.
> >
> >
>
> I've had a brief look at this proposal (to allow reporting of the
> command tag along with username, datab
