Tom Lane said: > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I am about to redo the patch that would allow tagging of log lines >> with info via a printf-style string. > >> Any comments or suggestions before I start? > > I think Bruce already applied the previous version of your patch.
Not that I can see. He did just apply the log_disconnections patch, but I had split that out from this facility - back in August I did them together in one never-applied patch. > No > problem with yanking it out for a better version --- but please supply > the update as a diff from CVS tip. Fewer chances for error that way. > I always do a CVS update before making a patch (unless I forget). cheers andrew ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
