Thanks Michael for working on this.
On 2017/09/27 11:28, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been looking more closely at the problem in $subject, that I
> have mentioned a couple of times, like here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cab7npqqa37oune_rjzpmwc4exqalx9f27-ma_-rsfl_3mj+
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> In conclusion, I think that the open item of $subject should be
> removed from the list, and we should try to get the multi-VACUUM patch
> in to cover any future problems. I'll do so if there are no
> objections.
And done. Moved to the no
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> On 9/26/17, 9:28 PM, "Michael Paquier" wrote:
>> In conclusion, I think that the open item of $subject should be
>> removed from the list, and we should try to get the multi-VACUUM patch
>> in to cover any future problems. I'll do so if th
On 9/26/17, 9:28 PM, "Michael Paquier" wrote:
> In conclusion, I think that the open item of $subject should be
> removed from the list, and we should try to get the multi-VACUUM patch
> in to cover any future problems. I'll do so if there are no
> objections.
If someone did want to add logging f
