On 9/26/17, 9:28 PM, "Michael Paquier" <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > In conclusion, I think that the open item of $subject should be > removed from the list, and we should try to get the multi-VACUUM patch > in to cover any future problems. I'll do so if there are no > objections.
If someone did want to add logging for vacuum_rel() and analyze_rel() in v10 after your patch was applied, wouldn't the NULL RangeVars force us to skip the new log statements for partitions? I think we might instead want to back-patch the VacuumRelation infrastructure so that we can appropriately log for partitions. However, I'm dubious that it is necessary to make such a big change so close to release for hypothetical log statements. So, in the end, I agree with you. Nathan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
