MAIL PROTECTED]
[14] main(argc=1, argv=0x8047c44, 0x8047c4c) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[15] _start() [0x806ad1c]
debug>
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 14:03:42 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list
9 23:06:05 2003
Not sure it helps...
Regards
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 15:49:05 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 73.5 and uw 713
>
> > Is there ay way I can help with this
Hi Neil and Tom
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Neil Conway wrote:
> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 22:44:42 -0500
> From: Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Is there ay way I can help with this debugging?
Can you speculate on what might have caused the crash?
Is the crash reproducible?
When the backend crashed, it should have produced a core file
(assuming your system is configured to do so). Can you post the
stacktrace y
Is there ay way I can help with this debugging?
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 14:03:42 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 73.5 and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I've upgraded my system from 7.3.4 to 7.3.5 yesterday and have already
> experienced to crash during vacuum full.
> I have'nt recompiled with debug yet but it's a sigsegv in function
> repair_frag in vacuum.c
Considering that vacuum.c hasn't changed in that branch since
