On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:56:39PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tor, 2011-03-24 at 16:05 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Anyway, here is a small patch that changes the duplicate_oids script
> > to return a nonzero exit status in case of a problem, and then creates
> > a global maintainer-
On tor, 2011-03-24 at 16:05 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Anyway, here is a small patch that changes the duplicate_oids script
> to return a nonzero exit status in case of a problem, and then creates
> a global maintainer-check target that checks that and the SGML syntax
> and the NLS thing. Ot
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tor, 2011-02-10 at 12:58 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> There is make check target in doc/src/sgml/ that is supposed to catch
>> this. But it's probably hard to remember to run that.
>>
>> One thing I was thinking of was that we cou
On tor, 2011-02-10 at 12:58 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> There is make check target in doc/src/sgml/ that is supposed to catch
> this. But it's probably hard to remember to run that.
>
> One thing I was thinking of was that we could add a global make
> maintainer-check target (a name I picked
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:29:43AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue feb 10 07:58:16 -0300 2011:
>
> > One thing I was thinking of was that we could add a global make
> > maintainer-check target (a name I picked up from other projects)
> > which would r
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:16:09PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tor, 2011-02-10 at 10:40 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> > I think all such checks belong in .git/hooks/pre-commit, and need
> > to be as cross-platform as needed for committers. Would a
> > *n*x-based version do for a start?
>
>
On tor, 2011-02-10 at 10:40 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> I think all such checks belong in .git/hooks/pre-commit, and need to
> be as cross-platform as needed for committers. Would a *n*x-based
> version do for a start?
I think as a matter of principle, the only things that belongs into git
hooks
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:58:16PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2011-02-09 at 08:00 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 01:17:06PM +, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Remove more SGML tabs.
> >
> > Perhaps we should see about putting something in .git/hooks/pre-commit
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue feb 10 07:58:16 -0300 2011:
> One thing I was thinking of was that we could add a global make
> maintainer-check target (a name I picked up from other projects) which
> would run various source code sanity checks. Besides the SGML tabs
> issue, my f
On ons, 2011-02-09 at 08:00 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 01:17:06PM +, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Remove more SGML tabs.
>
> Perhaps we should see about putting something in .git/hooks/pre-commit
> so people can focus on more substantive matters.
>
> Is there some kind o
On Feb 9, 2011 5:01 PM, "David Fetter" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 01:17:06PM +, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Remove more SGML tabs.
>
> Perhaps we should see about putting something in .git/hooks/pre-commit
> so people can focus on more substantive matters.
>
> Is there some kind of cross-
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 01:17:06PM +, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Remove more SGML tabs.
Perhaps we should see about putting something in .git/hooks/pre-commit
so people can focus on more substantive matters.
Is there some kind of cross-platform way to do this? I'm thinking
that given the fact th
12 matches
Mail list logo
