Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail

2017-07-31 Thread Amit Langote
On 2017/08/01 12:45, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > On 2017/08/01 10:18, Amit Langote wrote: >> Good points; fixed in the updated patch. > > I should have mentioned this in an earlier mail, but one thing I noticed > is this: > > -the remote server. > +the remote server. That becomes especially i

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail

2017-07-31 Thread Etsuro Fujita
On 2017/08/01 10:18, Amit Langote wrote: Good points; fixed in the updated patch. I should have mentioned this in an earlier mail, but one thing I noticed is this: -the remote server. +the remote server. That becomes especially important if the table is +being used in a partitio

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail

2017-07-31 Thread Amit Langote
On 2017/08/01 10:10, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Amit Langote > wrote: > >> >> On a second thought though, I think we should list the foreign table >> partitions' limitations in only one place, that is, the CREATE FOREIGN >> TABLE reference page. Listing them under

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail

2017-07-31 Thread David G. Johnston
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Amit Langote wrote: > > On a second thought though, I think we should list the foreign table > partitions' limitations in only one place, that is, the CREATE FOREIGN > TABLE reference page. Listing them under 5.10.2.3. seems a bit off to me, > because other limit

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail

2017-07-31 Thread Amit Langote
On 2017/08/01 6:41, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Amit Langote < > langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > >>> I'm curious what the other limitations are... >> >> When I first wrote that documentation line (I am assuming you're asking >> about "although these have so

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail

2017-07-31 Thread David G. Johnston
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Amit Langote < langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > I'm curious what the other limitations are... > > When I first wrote that documentation line (I am assuming you're asking > about "although these have some limitations that normal tables do not"), I > was th

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail

2017-07-30 Thread Amit Langote
Thank you for weighing in and reviewing the patch. On 2017/07/28 20:55, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > On 2017/07/26 15:29, Amit Langote wrote: >> On 2017/07/25 9:43, David G. Johnston wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Amit Langote wrote: >>> I'm curious what the other limitations are... > > I

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail

2017-07-28 Thread Etsuro Fujita
On 2017/07/26 15:29, Amit Langote wrote: On 2017/07/25 9:43, David G. Johnston wrote: On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Amit Langote wrote: On 2017/07/25 6:28, mtun...@gmail.com wrote: The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 14759 Logged by: Murat Tuncer

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail

2017-07-25 Thread Amit Langote
On 2017/07/25 9:43, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Amit Langote > wrote: > >> On 2017/07/25 6:28, mtun...@gmail.com wrote: >>> The following bug has been logged on the website: >>> >>> Bug reference: 14759 >>> Logged by: Murat Tuncer >>> Email address: