I have to say that during beta testing I ALWAYS do an initdb and a reload
just to make sure the pg_dumpall and pg_restore stuff works right. Plus
to make sure problems that might only pop up with a new initdb are found
as well. I probably "burn it to the ground" several times on a single
bet
Can I buy an extra day or two? I'm in DC till Saturday then there's the
trip home. How 'bout a wednesday beta release?
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > ... I'm going to do up a beta2
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
> Yeah, we should do something with that. Are people okay with the idea
> of CREATE LANGUAGE, etc, retroactively changing prorettype from OPAQUE
> to the correct thing?
>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >> Yeah, we should do something with that. Are people okay with the idea
> >> of CREATE LANGUAGE, etc, retroactively changing prorettype from OPAQUE
> >> to the correct thing?
>
> > Seems like an appropriate ti
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> Yeah, we should do something with that. Are people okay with the idea
>> of CREATE LANGUAGE, etc, retroactively changing prorettype from OPAQUE
>> to the correct thing?
> Seems like an appropriate time to throw a notice, though.
Tom Lane writes:
> Yeah, we should do something with that. Are people okay with the idea
> of CREATE LANGUAGE, etc, retroactively changing prorettype from OPAQUE
> to the correct thing?
Seems like an appropriate time to throw a notice, though.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looking at the open item list, I see:
> fix up function return types on lang/type/trigger creation or
> loosen opaque restrictions
> Seems that should be fixed before beta2 because it does effect people
> loading data.
Yeah, we should
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ... I'm going to do up a beta2 on Friday due to the number changes
> > that have been committed over the past 2 weeks ...
>
> I want to review and apply Alvaro's attisinherited fix before we go
> beta2. I t
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ... I'm going to do up a beta2 on Friday due to the number changes
> > that have been committed over the past 2 weeks ...
>
> I want to review and apply Alvaro's attisinherited fix before we go
> beta2. I think I can get that d
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... I'm going to do up a beta2 on Friday due to the number changes
> that have been committed over the past 2 weeks ...
I want to review and apply Alvaro's attisinherited fix before we go
beta2. I think I can get that done tomorrow. I can't recal
> I completely agree with Bruce here. Requiring an initdb for every beta
> release significantly reduces the number of people who will be willing
> to try it out -- so initdb's between betas are not disasterous, but
> should be avoided if possible.
But it does mean that 7.3 to 7.3 pg_dump gets a
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > We should get _all_ the known initdb-related issues into the code
> > before we go beta2 or beta3 is going to require another initdb.
>
> Right, and? How many times in the past has it been the last bet
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > > We are going to require an initdb for beta2 and I think we need to get
> > > > _everything_ required in there before going to beta2. See
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > We are going to require an initdb for beta2 and I think we need to get
> > > _everything_ required in there before going to beta2. See the open
> > > items list. I think w
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > We are going to require an initdb for beta2 and I think we need to get
> > _everything_ required in there before going to beta2. See the open
> > items list. I think we will need until the middle of next week for
> > beta
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We are going to require an initdb for beta2 and I think we need to get
> _everything_ required in there before going to beta2. See the open
> items list. I think we will need until the middle of next week for
> beta2. In fact, I have the inheritance
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Sean Chittenden wrote:
>
> > > There has been a lot of activity on open items in the past week. Here
> > > is the updated list.
> > >
> > > Basically, upgrading and casting have blown up into a variety of items.
> >
> > What's the timeframe for beta
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > There has been a lot of activity on open items in the past week. Here
> > is the updated list.
> >
> > Basically, upgrading and casting have blown up into a variety of items.
>
> What's the timeframe for beta2? FreeBSD's going into a ports freeze
18 matches
Mail list logo
