Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > We are going to require an initdb for beta2 and I think we need to get > > _everything_ required in there before going to beta2. See the open > > items list. I think we will need until the middle of next week for > > beta2. In fact, I have the inheritance patch that will require an > > initdb and that isn't even applied yet; Friday is too early. > > We are in beta, not release ... the purpose of going to beta2 is to > provide a new checkpoint to work bug reports off of, so having to deal > with an initdb should not be considered a problem by anyone, since only a > fool would run beta in production, no? (and ya, I am such a fool at times, > but i do accept the fact that I am such *grin*)
We should get _all_ the known initdb-related issues into the code before we go beta2 or beta3 is going to require another initdb. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
