Gavin Sherry wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > One of my users is generating a notice message --> NOTICE: Adding
> > > missing FROM-clause entry for table "msg202" It might be helpful to
> > > dump out the query on notice messages
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > > 3. Not sure what the "original" is for -- you're not transforming
> > > anything.
> >
> > Agreed. Just call it "Error query". Seems clear to me.
> What about rule(s) transformation(s)? Will we see the real query or the
> transformed query?
Well, looking at Gavin's
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 14:05, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Gavin Sherry writes:
> >
> > > Attached is the patch. debug_print_error_query is set to false by default.
> > >
> > > For want of a better phrase, I've prepended 'original query: ' to the
> > > error message to highli
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Gavin Sherry writes:
>
> > Attached is the patch. debug_print_error_query is set to false by default.
> >
> > For want of a better phrase, I've prepended 'original query: ' to the
> > error message to highlight why it is in the log.
>
> >From your resident How-To-Name-S
Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
> Do you think that 'original query: ..' looks a bit like bad english? Should
> it be properly capitalised? ie. 'Original query: ...'? Just nitpicking...
I find it's generally better to not capitalize anything in program
messages, unless the sentence/paragraph
Gavin Sherry writes:
> Attached is the patch. debug_print_error_query is set to false by default.
>
> For want of a better phrase, I've prepended 'original query: ' to the
> error message to highlight why it is in the log.
>From your resident How-To-Name-Stuff Nitpicker:
1. The names of the deb
l query: ...'? Just nitpicking...
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gavin Sherry
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 August 2002 2:27 PM
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Hackers; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] P
