On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 09:05 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> maybe we should be using the tables that exists in the regression
> database or adding hs_setup_primary in installcheck to prepare the
> regression database to run standbycheck in the standby server
This can definitely use some improvemen
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 13:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs writes:
> > On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 12:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Where is this test procedure documented?
>
> > In src/test/regress/standby_schedule
>
> That's a good way to ensure nobody knows it's there :-(
>
> If you want us
Simon Riggs writes:
> On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 12:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Where is this test procedure documented?
> In src/test/regress/standby_schedule
That's a good way to ensure nobody knows it's there :-(
If you want users to run this, document it in cookbook fashion in
doc/src/sgml/regr
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 12:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs writes:
> > On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 09:05 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> >> maybe we should be using the tables that exists in the regression
> >> database or adding hs_setup_primary in installcheck to prepare the
> >> regression datab
Simon Riggs writes:
> On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 09:05 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> maybe we should be using the tables that exists in the regression
>> database or adding hs_setup_primary in installcheck to prepare the
>> regression database to run standbycheck in the standby server
> That's part
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 09:05 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> maybe we should be using the tables that exists in the regression
> database or adding hs_setup_primary in installcheck to prepare the
> regression database to run standbycheck in the standby server
That's part of the procedure already.
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 02:45 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > How many of the tests in the regular regression suite do anything useful
>> > when run against a standby server?
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 02:45 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
> wrote:
> >
> > How many of the tests in the regular regression suite do anything useful
> > when run against a standby server? They all have to set up a bunch of
> > objects before they
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
>
> How many of the tests in the regular regression suite do anything useful
> when run against a standby server? They all have to set up a bunch of
> objects before they run queries, so you just get a lot of errors
> complaining that you
Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Jaime Casanova
> wrote:
>> 3) it should execute the existing set of tests (the ones installcheck
>> execute) but with a new set of expected results, that way we can be
>> sure that what should be disallowed is disallowed and that the
>> data
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Jaime Casanova
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Jaime Casanova
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Jaime Casanova
>> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> i think "make standbycheck" needs a little more work, why it isn't
>> accesible from top of source dir?
>>
>
>
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Jaime Casanova
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Jaime Casanova
> wrote:
>>
>
> i think "make standbycheck" needs a little more work, why it isn't
> accesible from top of source dir?
>
what i want to do.
1) make standbycheck should be accesible from top
12 matches
Mail list logo
