On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 02:45 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Heikki Linnakangas >> <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> > >> > How many of the tests in the regular regression suite do anything useful >> > when run against a standby server? They all have to set up a bunch of >> > objects before they run queries, so you just get a lot of errors >> > complaining that you can't do X in standby mode, followed by errors >> > about missing objects. That doesn't sound very useful. >> > >> >> granted. what i'm looking for is a way of continually see that the >> standby will return consistent values and yes, i want to be sure that >> we disallow everything that we need to... >> >> maybe just a new set of tests? maybe i just should make the hs_* tests >> use regression's database tables intead of the ones it is using? > > The existing standbycheck does statically test for all the things that > should be allowed and all the things that should be disallowed. If its > missing some, please say. >
maybe we should be using the tables that exists in the regression database or adding hs_setup_primary in installcheck to prepare the regression database to run standbycheck in the standby server -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL AsesorÃa y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
